![]() |
|
|
|||
Running lane has no bearing on anything here.
The question is going to come down to "what did the BR do to interfere with the play" I don't see anything offered to rule INT in any of the scenarios offered.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
The running lane is irrelevant - the play is identical to the case play. No INT.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
So when you say "BR contacts the thrown ball", that implies she did something to interfere. If you had said "the thrown ball hits the BR", it would likely be nothing.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
throw-in after double personal during free throw | closetotheedge | Basketball | 26 | Mon Dec 01, 2008 02:39am |
Positioning on throw home | prosec34 | Baseball | 17 | Tue Jul 03, 2007 01:59am |
3 man mechanic on sideline throw in below free throw line extended!!!! | jritchie | Basketball | 10 | Tue Nov 01, 2005 02:43pm |
"C" mechanics on a throw home from OF | WestMichBlue | Softball | 6 | Fri Jul 02, 2004 11:36am |
OBR 709(a) Dropped third strike, hinders catcher? | LionsCoach | Baseball | 9 | Mon Jun 16, 2003 07:32pm |