What do you do?

IRISHMAFIA · #1 (**permalink**) Sun Jul 21, 2013, 07:13pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by youngump

The rule is not super clear in the copy of the rulebook I have digitally. Hopefully it's been edited since then. But it's 8-5-L and the effect is simply a dead ball. I think the effect from M was meant to be attached. When you have spectator interference, you rule as to what would have happened and do that. The rules supplement seems to suggest the same. In this case, I don't think it applies because to interfere you have to interfere with a play.

Nope. Rule doesn't apply

youngump · #2 (**permalink**) Sun Jul 21, 2013, 07:18pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

Nope. Rule doesn't apply

Why? Isn't throwing a ball into the middle of the field interference if it impedes a fielder executing a play?

Skahtboi · #3 (**permalink**) Sun Jul 21, 2013, 07:30pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by youngump

Why? Isn't throwing a ball into the middle of the field interference if it impedes a fielder executing a play?

Who was impeded in this situation?

youngump · #4 (**permalink**) Sun Jul 21, 2013, 08:39pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skahtboi

Who was impeded in this situation?

Nobody, which is why I don't advocate killing it in this situation. I was understand Mike to be saying that whatever you do in any ball on field situation isn't based on your interpretation of the spectator interference rule and if not I'm not sure what rule you do use to fix it.

IRISHMAFIA · #5 (**permalink**) Sun Jul 21, 2013, 08:55pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by youngump

Nobody, which is why I don't advocate killing it in this situation. I was understand Mike to be saying that whatever you do in any ball on field situation isn't based on your interpretation of the spectator interference rule and if not I'm not sure what rule you do use to fix it.

To start, spectator interference is when a spectator enters the field of play and interferes. No spectator interfered with the play.

Second, there is nothing to fix, you start the play, you finish the play.

CecilOne · #6 (**permalink**) Mon Jul 22, 2013, 06:56am

Quote:

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

To start, spectator interference is when a spectator enters the field of play and interferes. No spectator interfered with the play.

Second, there is nothing to fix, you start the play, you finish the play.

Is this wrong, if it affected the fielder or the runner?
"If the ball struck one of them, probably have to call a dead. "b" or "c" depending on who is affected. "

MD Longhorn · #7 (**permalink**) Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:53am

Perhaps a play where someone was actually affected would make this clearer to some.

Grounder to F4, who fields the ball cleanly. As she is beginning to throw to 1st base, she is struck by a ball that came from another field, and she throws errantly, causing the batter runner to be safe.

A) Umpire the game in front of you - runner is safe.
B) Dead ball, reset (do-over)
C) Dead ball, place runners where you think they would have gotten to, no outs.
D) Dead ball, place runners and grant outs where you think they would have gotten to or happened.

My ruling - A. Soon to be ejected DC's ruling is likely B or D.