The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 20, 2013, 07:03am
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
"Last Time By" Interpretation

Was wondering if the concept known as "last time by" in baseball circles also exists in softball, specifically in ASA. I'll explain by giving an example.

R1 on first, one out. Fly ball to right-center field, and R1, thinking there are two outs, takes off for second. She rounds second when she hears her third base coach yell at her to go back. R1 turns and heads back to first without retouching second.

F8 makes the catch, and comes up throwing to first. The throw eludes F3 as R1 slides back into the bag, and also gets by F2 backing up on the play. As the ball rattles around the backstop, R1 is able to pop up, and make it safely all the way to third base, touching the bag at second on the way.

Under most baseball rule sets that I'm aware of, an appeal of R1 for missing second on the way back to first would not be ruled an out, because the runner did touch second the last time he ran by it. R1 is essentially given credit for correcting his blunder by subsequently touching the missed base during the course of play.

How would this be ruled in ASA?
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 20, 2013, 10:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny A View Post
Was wondering if the concept known as "last time by" in baseball circles also exists in softball, specifically in ASA. I'll explain by giving an example.

R1 on first, one out. Fly ball to right-center field, and R1, thinking there are two outs, takes off for second. She rounds second when she hears her third base coach yell at her to go back. R1 turns and heads back to first without retouching second.

F8 makes the catch, and comes up throwing to first. The throw eludes F3 as R1 slides back into the bag, and also gets by F2 backing up on the play. As the ball rattles around the backstop, R1 is able to pop up, and make it safely all the way to third base, touching the bag at second on the way.

Under most baseball rule sets that I'm aware of, an appeal of R1 for missing second on the way back to first would not be ruled an out, because the runner did touch second the last time he ran by it. R1 is essentially given credit for correcting his blunder by subsequently touching the missed base during the course of play.

How would this be ruled in ASA?
So, the R missed 2nd while returning; then retouched it after running to 1st and back. Safe so far.
Then, separate move, advances to 3rd.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat Jul 20, 2013, 08:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny A View Post
Was wondering if the concept known as "last time by" in baseball circles also exists in softball, specifically in ASA. I'll explain by giving an example.

R1 on first, one out. Fly ball to right-center field, and R1, thinking there are two outs, takes off for second. She rounds second when she hears her third base coach yell at her to go back. R1 turns and heads back to first without retouching second.

F8 makes the catch, and comes up throwing to first. The throw eludes F3 as R1 slides back into the bag, and also gets by F2 backing up on the play. As the ball rattles around the backstop, R1 is able to pop up, and make it safely all the way to third base, touching the bag at second on the way.

Under most baseball rule sets that I'm aware of, an appeal of R1 for missing second on the way back to first would not be ruled an out, because the runner did touch second the last time he ran by it. R1 is essentially given credit for correcting his blunder by subsequently touching the missed base during the course of play.

How would this be ruled in ASA?
My ruling is safe. Since the runner had touched second base legally after missing it, the appeal potential is removed. Had the ball not gotten away from the defense and she remainded at 1b, then the D can successfully appeal the missed base.

This is no different than a runner missing second base as she goes by, gets to 3b, realizes she missed it, goes back to second, touches second then goes back to third.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 22, 2013, 08:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
How does one correct missing a base? By returning and touching it. Does the runner in your scenario (or any LTB scenarios) return to the missed base and touch it? Yes.

LTB is an unneeded crutch.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jul 22, 2013, 12:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
How does one correct missing a base? By returning and touching it. Does the runner in your scenario (or any LTB scenarios) return to the missed base and touch it? Yes.

LTB is an unneeded crutch.
No it's not, and it seems like in previous discussions here we've said that this doesn't apply to softball. There are two possible ways you can correct a baserunning mistake like this.

A) Skip second on the way back to first, go back to second, go to third.
B) Skip second on the way back to first, touch first, touch second, go back to first, then advance to second and third.

LTB makes A okay, without last time by you need B.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Interpretation Regarding "Definite Knowledge" rfp Basketball 22 Mon Dec 21, 2009 03:00pm
Ran into an interpretation of the "tuck" rule I am not familiar with. CoachCER Basketball 10 Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:49pm
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight pizanno Basketball 27 Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am
New "AP Legal Touch" Rule/Different Interpretation BayStateRef Basketball 142 Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:53pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:26pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1