|
Thu May 23, 2013, 04:02pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
The interference happens when it happens... but an immediate call is not necessarily critical in this particular play. If you know it's catchable when the INT happens, call it. But on those plays where the ball is possibly going to end up near fence, there's nothing wrong with waiting a hair before announcing the call. After all, you can't really rule interference with a catch if there's no catch to be had.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Umpire Interference / Batter Interference | bob jenkins | Baseball | 17 | Mon Feb 06, 2012 09:57pm |
| batters interference/interference by teammate | _Bruno_ | Baseball | 7 | Mon Apr 07, 2008 07:28am |
| Runner interference versus umpire interference | Jay R | Baseball | 1 | Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm |
| Interference | just another ref | Baseball | 3 | Wed Jun 16, 2004 12:54am |
| Interference? | JRSooner | Baseball | 3 | Fri Apr 09, 2004 11:11am |
Threaded Mode
