![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
So I guess we can't rule the batter/runner out if there were less then 2 to begin with because the interference wasn't an attempt to prevent a double play? Or was it?
Last edited by ASA Ump MN; Wed May 15, 2013 at 04:06pm. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
What DP? Are you saying the INT would be the first out and it was intended to stop/delay the throw to 1st? If so, if R2 did not interfere, would only allow a one out opportunity.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
|
|||
|
With less than 2 outs, I'd think the first throw would most likely go to F2.
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Runner Interference | collint1993 | Baseball | 6 | Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:01am |
| runner interference | gipper | Softball | 17 | Fri May 06, 2005 11:21pm |
| Runner interference versus umpire interference | Jay R | Baseball | 1 | Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm |
| Runner Interference | Blaine Gallant | Baseball | 6 | Mon Jul 02, 2001 12:23pm |
| Is this runner interference? | BPorter | Baseball | 34 | Mon May 28, 2001 12:45pm |