The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
runner interference on throw runner interference on throw
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 15, 2013, 09:23am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
runner interference on throw
FED rules. Bases loaded. 2 outs. Grounder hit to F6. F6 fields the ball cleanly and as she comes up to throw, R2 runs into her (no tag or attempt to tag occurs here) causing a hesitation and late throw to 1st.

Ruling please.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 15, 2013, 09:31am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbmartin View Post
FED rules. Bases loaded. 2 outs. Grounder hit to F6. F6 fields the ball cleanly and as she comes up to throw, R2 runs into her (no tag or attempt to tag occurs here) causing a hesitation and late throw to 1st.

Ruling please.
INT, but hard to visualize " R2 runs into her (no tag"
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 15, 2013, 09:33am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
INT, but hard to visualize " R2 runs into her (no tag"
Agree on the unlikelihood of no tag... but assuming no tag, based on what rule would you rule interference?
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 15, 2013, 09:36am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 727
8-6-10c: The runner is out when the runner interferes with a fielder attempting to throw the ball.
__________________
"Not all heroes have time to pose for sculptors...some still have papers to grade."
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 15, 2013, 10:05am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 480
Quote:
Originally Posted by MD Longhorn View Post
Agree on the unlikelihood of no tag... but assuming no tag, based on what rule would you rule interference?
I was standing 8 feet away from the play...there was definately not a tag nor an attemped tag.

If INT on throw, delayed dead ball or immediate?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 15, 2013, 10:07am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbmartin View Post
I was standing 8 feet away from the play...there was definately not a tag nor an attemped tag.
I think what Cecil and I were alluding to is that it would not require an attempted tag to have actually had an inadvertent tag here. Not impossible .... just strange.

Quote:
If INT on throw, delayed dead ball or immediate?
Immediate.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 15, 2013, 10:08am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbmartin View Post
I was standing 8 feet away from the play...there was definately not a tag nor an attemped tag.

If INT on throw, delayed dead ball or immediate?
When is INT a DDB, other than ump Int?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 15, 2013, 01:22pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
When is INT a DDB, other than ump Int?
Coaches interference. Coach reaches out and grab a runner to stop her.

Other than umpire or coaches interference the ball is xead on INT. The reason these are not dead balls is that you dont want to penalize the defense for an offensive act.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Wed May 15, 2013, 10:08am
Call it as I see it.
  
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: So.Cal
Posts: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbmartin View Post
I was standing 8 feet away from the play...there was definately not a tag nor an attemped tag.

If INT on throw, delayed dead ball or immediate?
INT immediately dead ball
__________________
"I couldn't see well enough to play when I was a boy, so they gave me a special job - they made me an umpire." - President of the United States Harry S. Truman
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Runner Interference collint1993 Baseball 6 Wed Jun 15, 2011 11:01am
runner interference gipper Softball 17 Fri May 06, 2005 11:21pm
Runner interference versus umpire interference Jay R Baseball 1 Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm
Runner Interference Blaine Gallant Baseball 6 Mon Jul 02, 2001 12:23pm
Is this runner interference? BPorter Baseball 34 Mon May 28, 2001 12:45pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59am.

The Official Forum - Archive - Top


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1