![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
As I instructed this weekend, think of the dirt as one big brown rosin bag. The same rules that apply to the rosin bag apply to the dirt. |
|
|||
So NCAA is the only outlier?
__________________
Mark NFHS, NCAA, NAFA "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" Anton Chigurh - "No Country for Old Men" |
|
|||
Maybe not an "outlier" (I say this as I do teach a statistic class), but NCAA does have a different interpretation and requirements as to how drying agents are used.
And not to hijack the thread, I wonder why Gorilla Gold has not caught on as a drying agent in NCAA or NFHS play. It is wildly popular in men's fast pitch. |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Mark NFHS, NCAA, NAFA "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" Anton Chigurh - "No Country for Old Men" |
|
|||
Because it's men's fast pitch. Need I say more?
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker |
|
|||
What about the "chalk" lines? Can the pitcher now "rub" her hand into the "chalk" that same way she can the "big brown rosin bag"?
|
|
|||
Yes for the same reason it is part of the field.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Of course she can. Kind of wondering why anyone would want it to be any different. This message brought to you by the Society for the Prevention of Unnecessary Quotation Marks.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() |
|
|||
Quote:
Apply no foreign substance (directly) to the ball doesn't mean wipe your hand if you touch the field. If the ball has a substance foreign to the field, and you saw the pitcher (or any other defensive player) put it on, you have a violation. If the ball has dirt or chalk on it, they are substances part of the field, not a foreign substance. If the pitcher applies something directly to the ball, that is defacing the ball, and that violation applies. These approved rulings finally state more specifically what has been said before, although the nonbelievers continue to want it how they did it before. The fact that NFHS had to make these approved rulings without changing anything in the rule only points out that so many people ignored the correct application before. It is clear what the NCAA rule is; it should be equally clear that the NFHS and ASA rules are NOT the same, and should not have ever been treated the same.
__________________
Steve ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2006 NFHS Rule Interpretations | TxUmp | Baseball | 0 | Tue Feb 07, 2006 09:03am |
NFHS Baseball interpretations | DownTownTonyBrown | Baseball | 6 | Fri Feb 04, 2005 11:45pm |
NFHS RULES INTERPRETATIONS | whiskers_ump | Softball | 0 | Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:47pm |
NFHS Interpretations | MOFFICIAL | Basketball | 5 | Wed Feb 13, 2002 10:10am |