The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 20, 2013, 10:26pm
wife loves the goatee...
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Beach
Posts: 255
Discarded "mask"

NFHS

B1 hits ground ball to F5. F3 removes and discards her "infielders face mask".
F5's throw strikes the mask as it lays on the ground. F3 is able to retrive the ball and prevent B1 from advancing past 1st base.

Do you award any bases?

B1 hits pop up. F3 tosses mask. F3 whiffs on the catch and the ball strikes her discarded mask. B1 unable to advance past 1st.

Do you award any bases?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jan 20, 2013, 11:50pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
5-1-1-G dead ball table doesnt seem to differentiate between a thrown ball or a batted ball. #34 simply says for ball hitting equipment of team on defense. Dead ball, all runners advance 2 bases.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 21, 2013, 07:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
5-1-1-G dead ball table doesnt seem to differentiate between a thrown ball or a batted ball. #34 simply says for ball hitting equipment of team on defense. Dead ball, all runners advance 2 bases.
So, a ball hitting a catcher's mask is a 2-base award?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 21, 2013, 09:58am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
I have always been instructed catchers helmets and bats are considered part of the field once they are stationary on the field. However, so far I can find nowhere in the FED rules where it specifically states this unlike the NCAA rules where it lists catchers helmets, batters bat and runners helmets that may have inadvertantly come off.

There is mention of defensive facemasks in the FED rules with regard to obstruction. If a runner trips over, or is forced to go around a discarded defensive facemask it should be ruled obstruction.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 21, 2013, 11:47am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 286
NFHS 1-8-3 Loose equipment of the teams may not be on or near the field. A discarded bat by the batter or the catcher's mask and helmet are not examples of loose equipment. They [sic] are considered part of the playing field.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 21, 2013, 11:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crabby_Bob View Post
NFHS 1-8-3 Loose equipment of the teams may not be on or near the field. A discarded bat by the batter or the catcher's mask and helmet are not examples of loose equipment. They [sic] are considered part of the playing field.
I must have looked through the definitions 10 times last night and read over that every time. I knew it had to be in there somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 21, 2013, 06:24pm
Tex Tex is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 156
The infielder's mask is considered loose equipment as Crabby Bob stated, but can cause obstruction as RKBUmp stated.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 21, 2013, 08:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
I believe standing on a specific list could lead to all sorts of issues. If a runner's batting glove falls out of her pocket and the ball hits it, what are you going to do there? How about if a player loses a shoe, etc.?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 21, 2013, 09:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 52
Send a message via AIM to bluejay Send a message via Yahoo to bluejay
I guess it would be good to know the proper rule for the face mask on the ground but what percent of fielders actually wear a mask and how often do they throw it down? Just curious because I have never seen it or heard of it. Also, although the rule only mentions a catcher's mask, what would be the difference?
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 22, 2013, 09:01am
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluejay View Post
I guess it would be good to know the proper rule for the face mask on the ground but what percent of fielders actually wear a mask and how often do they throw it down? Just curious because I have never seen it or heard of it. Also, although the rule only mentions a catcher's mask, what would be the difference?
To your first question, it really doesn't matter how often we see a fielder wear a mask and then remove it and throw it down. The fact is that it could happen, and the rules as written aren't very clear on how to handle it except for when it obstructs a runner.

What I find telling is that the NFHS casebook does specifically cover removed defensive players' facemasks in a caseplay, 1.8.4.A. And since rule 1-8-3 says only bats and catcher's masks are exempt from the loose equipment definition, then you could argue that NFHS treats those facemasks--as well as batter's helmets, loose shoes, loose hats, etc. etc.--as loose equipment for all intents and purposes.

I guess there's a reasonable expectation that a player isn't going to lose her facemask or batting helmet or hat or shoe or batting glove through the normal course of play. Only bats and catcher's helmets are exempt because they are always discarded.
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 22, 2013, 11:01am
wife loves the goatee...
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: The Beach
Posts: 255
picky, picky....

Does the fact that NFHS uses different terms ("loose equipment" vs "discarded equipment") impact your call?
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 22, 2013, 11:42am
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRJ1960 View Post
Does the fact that NFHS uses different terms ("loose equipment" vs "discarded equipment") impact your call?
Nope. To me, loose equipment is any equipment that is not in its proper place. It could've been detatched, discarded, removed, fallen off, blown off by the wind, whatever.

Would you rule obstuction if a runner was hindered by a discarded catcher's mask?
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 22, 2013, 01:42pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRJ1960 View Post
Does the fact that NFHS uses different terms ("loose equipment" vs "discarded equipment") impact your call?
Yes. Loose equipment is an item not currently involved in the game, but left on the field; contact with the ball should always result in a blocked ball, any judgment of possible obstruction or interference should be strictly enforced.

Discarded equipment is something involved in the game that is normally expected to become part of the field (catcher's mask, batter's bat), or might accidently become loose (cap falls off while running, batting glove falls out of pocket) and contact can be ignored if not deemed interference or obstruction.

Detached equipment is something intentionally used improperly to impact on a play, and should always result in the minimum three base award.

Interestingly (or more likely considered overkill), NCAA insists that umpires make all participants (runners and defensive players) put all batting gloves FULLY in pockets, even fingertips cannot hang out, to make sure they don't impact on a play or result in a blocked ball ruling.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 22, 2013, 01:54pm
Stirrer of the Pot
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Lowcountry, SC
Posts: 2,380
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve View Post
Yes. Loose equipment is an item not currently involved in the game, but left on the field; contact with the ball should always result in a blocked ball, any judgment of possible obstruction or interference should be strictly enforced.

Discarded equipment is something involved in the game that is normally expected to become part of the field (catcher's mask, batter's bat), or might accidently become loose (cap falls off while running, batting glove falls out of pocket) and contact can be ignored if not deemed interference or obstruction.

Detached equipment is something intentionally used improperly to impact on a play, and should always result in the minimum three base award.

Interestingly (or more likely considered overkill), NCAA insists that umpires make all participants (runners and defensive players) put all batting gloves FULLY in pockets, even fingertips cannot hang out, to make sure they don't impact on a play or result in a blocked ball ruling.
Hmmm, interesting. That's not clearly stated in either the rule book or case book. Is there some other authoritative NFHS document that covers this, or perhaps an official interpretation on its website?
__________________
"Let's face it. Umpiring is not an easy or happy way to make a living. In the abuse they suffer, and the pay they get for it, you see an imbalance that can only be explained by their need to stay close to a game they can't resist." -- Bob Uecker
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Jan 22, 2013, 02:08pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manny A View Post
Hmmm, interesting. That's not clearly stated in either the rule book or case book. Is there some other authoritative NFHS document that covers this, or perhaps an official interpretation on its website?
Compilation of various citations, including (and probably missing a few):

2-2-3
5-1-2b
Dead ball table #33, #34
Delayed dead ball table #4
8-4-3e and Penalty
8-4-3f Penalty and Exception 3
8-6-15 Penalty
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Starter" Mask Rufus Baseball 22 Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:38pm
Is "the patient whistle" and "possession consequence" ruining the game? fiasco Basketball 46 Fri Dec 02, 2011 08:43am
The Umpire Mask Hook: "I'll take 2!" UMP25 Baseball 84 Fri Jul 10, 2009 09:44am
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight pizanno Basketball 27 Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am
15 YARD FACE MASK FOUL - Enforced As A "tack-on"? RoyGardner Football 10 Thu Jan 17, 2008 02:00pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1