|
Sun Apr 13, 2003, 05:11pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please help me on #45. R1 is on 1B with no outs, unreported substitute B2 is at bat with a one ball and a one strike count B2 grounds into a force out at 2B retiring R1. Before the next pitch, the defensive team notifies the unpire that B2 is unreported. The umpire should rule:
a: R1 is out. B2 is out, removed from 1B and is disqualified. b: R1 is returned to 1B. B2 is removed from 1B and disqualified. c: R1 is returned to 1B and a substitute enters to bat for B2. d: R1 is out and a legal substitute replaces B2 at 1B It seems to me they are all incorrect. a:B2 would not be out so incorrect answer. b:R1 was out on the play and the rules states that all outs that occur on this play will stand, so incorrect. c:same for this question, R1 was out on this play, so incorrect. d:rule states that all runners(including batter)will return to the base occupied on the batted ball(she was batting) so cannot be replaced at 1B, so incorrect. PLEASE shed some light on this question? Thanks, Dave 
|
|
Mon Apr 14, 2003, 12:33am
|
|||
|
|||
|
The correct answer is a.
R1's out on the play stands. Because the appeal was made before the next pitch, B2 is also out. Further, because B2 was an unreported sub, he is disqualified. If a pitch was thrown and then the defense appealed B2, he would be disqualified, but he would not be out. A substitute would run for him. If the offense notified the umpire of the substitution before the defense appealed, B2's entry would have become legal. See sections 4-6 and 4-7.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide!
|
|
Mon Apr 14, 2003, 10:06am
|
|||
|
|||
|
I think you may be right, Shipwreck. I had a problem with question #45, too, and at our rules meeting brought up the fact that an unreported substitute is not necessarily an illegal player. In fact, 4-6-B-2 clearly implies that the unreported substitute might not be an illegal player. In the hurried atmosphere of the meeting, I accepted the explanation they gave me. But apparently, only if the unreported substitute was an illegal player would he be called out.
Unless some other poster can explain why "a" is indeed correct, I think ASA wrongly equated "unreported substitute" with "illegal player" and produced yet another faulty question.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide!
|
|
Mon Apr 14, 2003, 10:50am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Del-Blue, in the case they sited in the question, it states the the unreported sub grounds into a force out at 2B retiring R1. The unreported sub never was called out, so that part of the rule has no bearing on the answer. Dave
|
|
Mon Apr 14, 2003, 11:56am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
All Bob did was respond to your belief that all runners are returned to the previous base. Any put out, remain out as Bob noted. As far as the rest of the question goes, I think those posing the question on the test did mistakenly mixed "unreported sub" with "illegal player". The rule the answer sheet cites is the "illegal player" rule, but the casebook cite is that of the "unreported sub" rule. I believe the answer should be the last half of C and the first half of D. [Edited by IRISHMAFIA on Apr 14th, 2003 at 01:37 PM]
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|
|
Mon Apr 14, 2003, 01:20pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Shipwreck, you are absolutely right. The correct answer should have been "e: none of the above." I should have pursued the matter at the rules meeting, and thank you for bringing this up.
ASA case play 4.6-7 is question #45: R1 is on 1B with no outs, unreported substitute B2 is at bat with a 1-ball, 1-strike count. B2 grounds into a force out at 2B retiring R1. Before the next pitch, the defensive team notifies the umpire that B2 is unreported. Ruling: R1's out remains. B2 is removed from 1B and disqualified. A legal substitute assumes the batting position and assumes a count of 1-ball, 1-strike. (4-6B) (Note: This is verbatim from the case book; thus the various grammar/punctuation errors.) Once again, ASA has failed to proofread their test.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide!
|
|
Mon Apr 14, 2003, 03:29pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
greymule, thanks a bunch for looking that up. I read the question about 10 times thinking maybe I had missed something. For a while I thought I was losing my marbles or something. Dave
|
|
Mon Apr 14, 2003, 09:18pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Does anyone have the official answer key to this test so we can check our answers to what the pros believe are the correct ones?
My email is [email protected]. If you cannot email the answer sheet, let me know and I can send you my fax number. Thanks. (I agree ASA always has a question here and there where there is no right answer!)
__________________
Bobby
|
|
Mon Apr 14, 2003, 09:41pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
When I offer an answer to a test question, I offer exactly what the sheet states.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|
|
Tue Apr 15, 2003, 07:49am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Where I am, we do not turn in our tests or have any closed book testing. The administrator simply reads off the answers during a long drawn out meeting where the first year officials ask many questions.
I cannot attend the above this year do to NFHS games. That was why I was looking for an answer key to check my answers. With that being said, thanks for your help Mike. Just as any UIC, always there to help out, when it is convenient. I apologize, I thought this board was to assist everyone.
__________________
Bobby
|
|
Tue Apr 15, 2003, 11:56am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I don't know who you are, where you are or for whom you work. As far as I know, you are just looking for an easy way out. And yes, that does happen. If Del-Blue ever gets a chance to get off the field this spring, I believe he will attest that I do not give out answers until I know people have made an effort to do the test. I assume he will also attest that once I see that effort, I am not overly stingy with them. But those are umpires for which I am responsible. To the best of my knowledge, you are not one of them. If you were, I would be more than happy to help you out. I don't understand that if you couldn't make the meeting to which you are referring, why your UIC wouldn't provide the answers for you. BTW, if you feel any differently, I wouldn't send them to anyone on the list, not just you. [Edited by IRISHMAFIA on Apr 15th, 2003 at 11:59 AM]
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
|
|
Tue Apr 15, 2003, 01:40pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Each year, the answers to about 90 of the 100 questions on the ASA test are obvious, and whatever difficulties lie in most of the rest stem from poor wording. Some involve levels that I never do, so I don't know how many 75-year-olds can be in the infield in Super Senior Co-ed Class B Slow Pitch or what ball is standard in Boys' JO Modified. Typically, there are only two or three questions on which I'd want to check my answer.
And each year, a few questions/answers are either wrong (#45 this year), or badly worded (the one about the white/orange base and the throw from foul territory), or designed for mind-readers (#94 this year), or carelessly transcribed and thus ambiguous (coach asks for time to discuss rather than and discusses strategy). However, the test is good review and certainly productive to go over. I've learned more from ASA's erroneous questions than from their valid ones.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide!
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
