The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2011, 06:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 219
Are base runners always protected on a illegal pitch?

Are base runners always protected on a illegal pitch to advance one base? If we have a illegal pitch on a attempted steal are pick off attempt, what would be the appropriate mechanics if the base runner is tagged prior to advancing to the next base.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2011, 08:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 38
I see only three scenario's

#1 Runner left early. Violates LBR and dead ball out no pitch (occurs prior to illegal pitch and supercedes

#2 Illegal pitch batter doesn't put ball in play. Dead ball, ball on batter, baserunners advance.

#3 Illegal pitch batter does put ball in play. Pending result of ball in play Offense chooses result of play or ball on batter baserunners advance.

Can't be a pick off play on an illegal pitch because it's a dead ball once catcher has it.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2011, 08:40am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
There is a 4th possibility. If there is an illegal pitch prior to the leaving early, both infractions are enforced.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2011, 09:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snocatzdad View Post
I see only three scenario's

#1 Runner left early. Violates LBR and dead ball out no pitch (occurs prior to illegal pitch and supercedes

#2 Illegal pitch batter doesn't put ball in play. Dead ball, ball on batter, baserunners advance.

#3 Illegal pitch batter does put ball in play. Pending result of ball in play Offense chooses result of play or ball on batter baserunners advance.

Can't be a pick off play on an illegal pitch because it's a dead ball once catcher has it.
My experience is NSA only, but a assume this would apply universally??

#1 Just semantics, but not LBR violation. Simply leaving early violation.

#3 Coach MAY or MAY NOT have an option. "If the illegal pitch is hit and all runners including the batter-runner , advance one base, the play stands."
* This could lead to a situation where, for example, the D could get a double play and the O would have to live with it. - Is this different in other rule sets?
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2011, 09:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by robbie View Post
My experience is NSA only, but a assume this would apply universally??

#1 Just semantics, but not LBR violation. Simply leaving early violation.

#3 Coach MAY or MAY NOT have an option. "If the illegal pitch is hit and all runners including the batter-runner , advance one base, the play stands."
* This could lead to a situation where, for example, the D could get a double play and the O would have to live with it. - Is this different in other rule sets?
#3 yes, in NFHS if the batter becomes a batter runner, then they always have an option.

#1, I don't think it's only semantics. A couple months ago we had a discussion where it was pointed out that to violate the leaving early rule one just has to break contact but to violate the LBR one has to actually leave the base. Making it for example legal to lose contact while cleaning one's cleats.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2011, 12:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 350
Quote:
Originally Posted by robbie View Post
#3 Coach MAY or MAY NOT have an option. "If the illegal pitch is hit and all runners including the batter-runner , advance one base, the play stands."
* This could lead to a situation where, for example, the D could get a double play and the O would have to live with it. - Is this different in other rule sets?
Not sure how you have a double play and all runners advancing at the same time. If the runners are out, then they did not advance......Maybe runners advance then double tag out at third and second?? Uck..ugly play but I guess possible.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2011, 12:27pm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Illinois
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by youngump View Post
#1, I don't think it's only semantics. A couple months ago we had a discussion where it was pointed out that to violate the leaving early rule one just has to break contact but to violate the LBR one has to actually leave the base. Making it for example legal to lose contact while cleaning one's cleats.
How would one define the difference between leaving the base vs. breaking contact with the base?
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2011, 01:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadioBlue View Post
How would one define the difference between leaving the base vs. breaking contact with the base?
My question exactly.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2011, 01:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by derwil View Post
Not sure how you have a double play and all runners advancing at the same time. If the runners are out, then they did not advance......Maybe runners advance then double tag out at third and second?? Uck..ugly play but I guess possible.
You can have 100 ways to advance and then still get out. You have listed one.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2011, 02:31pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by RadioBlue View Post
How would one define the difference between leaving the base vs. breaking contact with the base?
The easiest example is the runner standing with one foot on the bag. She lifts up the foot on the bag and bangs it back down to clear the dirt off her cleat. She has lost contact with the base but not left it. Searching for the thread will probably get you more than hearing me recount it.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu May 12, 2011, 11:23pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by youngump View Post
The easiest example is the runner standing with one foot on the bag. She lifts up the foot on the bag and bangs it back down to clear the dirt off her cleat. She has lost contact with the base but not left it. Searching for the thread will probably get you more than hearing me recount it.
I don't recall the thread, but I have an opinion.

If you saw that, then you are looking at the wrong thing.

Leaving early on a pitch just isn't a LBR violation; it is leaving early on the pitch. Different rule citation (on the road, cannot cite the specifics).
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 13, 2011, 05:10am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 937
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve View Post
I don't recall the thread, but I have an opinion.

If you saw that, then you are looking at the wrong thing.

Leaving early on a pitch just isn't a LBR violation; it is leaving early on the pitch. Different rule citation (on the road, cannot cite the specifics).
If this helps.....
ASA....
Runner fails to keep contact w/base...8.7.s LookBackRule...8.7.t
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 13, 2011, 10:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 440
Quote:
Originally Posted by KJUmp View Post
If this helps.....
ASA....
Runner fails to keep contact w/base...8.7.s LookBackRule...8.7.t
I'll grant you that they are different rules.

However, when does LBR stop applying and failing to keep contact with the base start applying?
__________________
Just Tryin' to Learn...
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 13, 2011, 01:10pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Exactly. These two rules have always been redundant (well, one of them, at least). Same infraction, same penalty. No need to say it twice.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 14, 2011, 08:26am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 219
Kind of were I was going with my question is, on a IP does the ball become dead on a called ball on the batter or can the base runners attempt a steal in hopes of drawing a bad throw to keep advancing?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2 runners on a base vcblue Softball 14 Tue Jun 02, 2009 09:07pm
Two runners on same base? fan Softball 3 Thu Apr 27, 2006 07:54pm
2 runners on third base strike4 Softball 4 Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:42pm
2-runners....1 base gumpire Baseball 49 Wed Apr 07, 2004 02:01pm
2 runners on the same base Gre144 Baseball 4 Mon Jun 04, 2001 07:58am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1