The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 22, 2010, 01:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Desoto, TX
Posts: 254
working with 'that' partner....

This is not about working with 'that' partner, but more about getting feedback when issues arose when working with 'that' partner.

background:
A while back I was working a college look tourney and was working with a partner from another association, so I had never met him before. When I got into the complex, dressed for my assignment 45 minutes prior to my games to 'check in', i found that my partner had not arrived yet. No big deal, it was still 'early'.

When said partner did arrive (about 15 minutes before scheduled time), there was already a group of blues gathered chatting and such. (subject was a rule interpretation for another day I guess) He immediately gave his 'two cents' about the subject really without listening to others, more or less 'interrupting' the conversations. (which I just happened to not agree with his interpretation anyway)

anyway, flash forward to just after our first pre game, and introductions and while we are waiting for the teams to take the field, he asked 'just how long have you been doing this?' While that is not an odd question, I simply answered 'this is my 21 year'. Before I could barely get out 'year', he interrupts and gives me his 'resume' in what seemed to be eternity. Still not sure why he felt the need to do so but I strayed away cause the defense looked ready, and took my position in the A slot.

Later that game, we have a situation where R1 is on 2nd, and B2 hits a ground ball to F6. F6 fields the ground ball, and throws wild to F3, and the ball ends up going into dead ball territory. I signal and call dead ball and start giving the bases awarded. I point to B2 (who is standing on 2nd) and say 'your, award is 2nd'. I then point to R1 (who is standing on 3rd) and say 'your award is home'.

'That' partner comes out of the holding area and says 'no, she stays at third''

Now this is a 'college look' and as a rule, things are a little bit more low key, so i say 'You are not awarding two bases from the point of release?'. he answers with 'No, she stays at third and I am the plate umpire'.

While i wanted to 'get it right', I did not want to waste anymore time and the offensive coach just said 'if thats what you think, she will stay at third' (after the inning, the OC said he didn't want to waste anymore time either, and that this weekend was about getting his girls at-bats anyway)

after all this, my question is. when you are working with 'that' kind of partner, what are some ideas in handling situations where you don't agree with a rule interpretation? I understand if it is Championship play, there will be UIC's on site and such to confer with, but when that is not available, what are some ideas?

I'll hang up and listen.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 22, 2010, 02:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Midwest
Posts: 386
After Game

Have to ask....did this come up in post game discussions. And if so what was his response?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 22, 2010, 02:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: East Central, FL
Posts: 1,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by okla21fan View Post
This is not about working with 'that' partner, but more about getting feedback when issues arose when working with 'that' partner.

background:
A while back I was working a college look tourney and was working with a partner from another association, so I had never met him before. When I got into the complex, dressed for my assignment 45 minutes prior to my games to 'check in', i found that my partner had not arrived yet. No big deal, it was still 'early'.

When said partner did arrive (about 15 minutes before scheduled time), there was already a group of blues gathered chatting and such. (subject was a rule interpretation for another day I guess) He immediately gave his 'two cents' about the subject really without listening to others, more or less 'interrupting' the conversations. (which I just happened to not agree with his interpretation anyway)

anyway, flash forward to just after our first pre game, and introductions and while we are waiting for the teams to take the field, he asked 'just how long have you been doing this?' While that is not an odd question, I simply answered 'this is my 21 year'. Before I could barely get out 'year', he interrupts and gives me his 'resume' in what seemed to be eternity. Still not sure why he felt the need to do so but I strayed away cause the defense looked ready, and took my position in the A slot.

Later that game, we have a situation where R1 is on 2nd, and B2 hits a ground ball to F6. F6 fields the ground ball, and throws wild to F3, and the ball ends up going into dead ball territory. I signal and call dead ball and start giving the bases awarded. I point to B2 (who is standing on 2nd) and say 'your, award is 2nd'. I then point to R1 (who is standing on 3rd) and say 'your award is home'.

'That' partner comes out of the holding area and says 'no, she stays at third''

Now this is a 'college look' and as a rule, things are a little bit more low key, so i say 'You are not awarding two bases from the point of release?'. he answers with 'No, she stays at third and I am the plate umpire'.

While i wanted to 'get it right', I did not want to waste anymore time and the offensive coach just said 'if thats what you think, she will stay at third' (after the inning, the OC said he didn't want to waste anymore time either, and that this weekend was about getting his girls at-bats anyway)

after all this, my question is. when you are working with 'that' kind of partner, what are some ideas in handling situations where you don't agree with a rule interpretation? I understand if it is Championship play, there will be UIC's on site and such to confer with, but when that is not available, what are some ideas?

I'll hang up and listen.
It is an awkward situation, but first I have to ask why YOU called the dead ball. On an over throw, doesn't PU take the ball and BU the runners?


As for the other part....

The showcase I do are usually timed and as the coach said, the main thing is to get the girls a look, batting, fielding, baserunning, etc.
So after you demonstrated the correct award and the PU puts her back at third and OM doesn't care, I'd let it go (although I would be fuming at the PU for pulling something like that and have a few words with him after the game)

Oh and then I'd come here and vent!!!!

Which sounds pretty much like what you did.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 22, 2010, 05:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by HugoTafurst View Post
It is an awkward situation, but first I have to ask why YOU called the dead ball. On an over throw, doesn't PU take the ball and BU the runners?
R1 on 2nd, presumably going to 3rd where PU is SUPPOSED to be and facing, wouldn't the BU have a better look down the 1st base line?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 22, 2010, 05:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by okla21fan View Post
Later that game, we have a situation where R1 is on 2nd, and B2 hits a ground ball to F6. F6 fields the ground ball, and throws wild to F3, and the ball ends up going into dead ball territory. I signal and call dead ball and start giving the bases awarded. I point to B2 (who is standing on 2nd) and say 'your, award is 2nd'. I then point to R1 (who is standing on 3rd) and say 'your award is home'.

'That' partner comes out of the holding area and says 'no, she stays at third''

Now this is a 'college look' and as a rule, things are a little bit more low key, so i say 'You are not awarding two bases from the point of release?'. he answers with 'No, she stays at third and I am the plate umpire'.

While i wanted to 'get it right', I did not want to waste anymore time and the offensive coach just said 'if thats what you think, she will stay at third' (after the inning, the OC said he didn't want to waste anymore time either, and that this weekend was about getting his girls at-bats anyway)

after all this, my question is. when you are working with 'that' kind of partner, what are some ideas in handling situations where you don't agree with a rule interpretation? I understand if it is Championship play, there will be UIC's on site and such to confer with, but when that is not available, what are some ideas?

I'll hang up and listen.
How about a quick, private question/comment to "your partner" about why isn't it 2 from TOT. Then if s/he doesn't get it and OC is OK, let it go as you did.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 22, 2010, 06:03pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by HugoTafurst View Post
It is an awkward situation, but first I have to ask why YOU called the dead ball. On an over throw, doesn't PU take the ball and BU the runners?
Shared responsibility. Whoever sees it, calls it. If you want to pick a nit, the throw to 1B is the BUs, PU has a responsibility taking him/her away from that side of the field.

Quote:
The showcase I do are usually timed and as the coach said, the main thing is to get the girls a look, batting, fielding, baserunning, etc.
So after you demonstrated the correct award and the PU puts her back at third and OM doesn't care, I'd let it go (although I would be fuming at the PU for pulling something like that and have a few words with him after the game)

Oh and then I'd come here and vent!!!!

Which sounds pretty much like what you did.

I think the "I'm the plate umpire" comment may have set me off. Being the PU means absolutely nothing when it comes to the proper application of the rules. Now, if there are no applicable rule to be applied, then the PU takes control and makes the decisions.

Since I don't announce the base, but the award, I would have told R1, "two bases" and if the PU protested, I just may ask the coach if s/he wants to protest the game.

Yeah, I know, showcase, so I agree with the path you took here. Of course, that may be the last game with "that" partner.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.

Last edited by IRISHMAFIA; Wed Dec 22, 2010 at 06:07pm.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 23, 2010, 08:08am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Now, if there are no applicable rule to be applied, then the PU takes control and makes the decisions.
You are implying that the PU is always chief, but I don't think that is in any book. If one of us is with a newbie or one who acts newbie, we would be chief.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 23, 2010, 10:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
You are implying that the PU is always chief, but I don't think that is in any book. If one of us is with a newbie or one who acts newbie, we would be chief.
He's referring to ASA 10-1.
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 23, 2010, 10:50am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Desoto, TX
Posts: 254
Thanks for the feedback:

Because of the scheduling of this college look, the umpire rotation does not allow for a post game of any kind. The plate umpire after the game will leave the field to ungear while the base ump stays with another plate ump rotating in. The base ump will stays until the previous plate ump returns.

What I did end up doing was in between an inning, I casually mentioned to him that we 'were are team and while I disagreed with his interpretation i was not going to make an issue due to the tournament format.' I then suggested to him that it might be a good idea to brush up on dead ball territory awards when he got home that night. and left it at that.

Of course his retort was 'I have been doing this a long time and I know what I am doing'. Which I simply said 'okay' and then proceeded to take my position for the next inning.

Which brings up the 'situation' that was being discussed by the blues gathered, before the games that morning: (ASA ruleset)

1-2 count on the batter with 1 out. F1 pitches a legal pitch, but upon the release hits her hip with her pitching hand causing an 'errant' pitch (although legal) This pitch takes 1 bounce about 15 feet in front of the pitching rubber (aprox 28 feet from home plate) and continues in flight towards home plate. As the ball crosses home plate, B1 swings and misses the pitched ball. F2 catches the ball 'cleanly' after the swing and miss.

Is the D3K in effect?

The 'debate' for some, was that when the ball touched the ground, the pitch was not a 'strike' yet, so the D3K would not be in effect.

My ruling would have been that yes it is a D3K as the rule does not define 'when' a strike is called as a factor, but that the result of the pitch is a strike and the ball had touched the ground before being caught by F2.

thoughts?

(side bar: 'that' partner had no D3K because in his words 'the catcher caught the ball' )
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 23, 2010, 11:15am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Metro Atlanta
Posts: 870
No brainer: D3K - the catcher failed to catch strike three before the ball touched the ground.
Bizarre that it touched the ground so far away from home plate, but there are countless occurrances where the ball bounces right in front of home plate.
__________________
Tony
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 23, 2010, 11:35am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by okla21fan View Post
Thanks for the feedback:

Because of the scheduling of this college look, the umpire rotation does not allow for a post game of any kind. The plate umpire after the game will leave the field to ungear while the base ump stays with another plate ump rotating in. The base ump will stays until the previous plate ump returns.

What I did end up doing was in between an inning, I casually mentioned to him that we 'were are team and while I disagreed with his interpretation i was not going to make an issue due to the tournament format.' I then suggested to him that it might be a good idea to brush up on dead ball territory awards when he got home that night. and left it at that.

Of course his retort was 'I have been doing this a long time and I know what I am doing'. Which I simply said 'okay' and then proceeded to take my position for the next inning.

Which brings up the 'situation' that was being discussed by the blues gathered, before the games that morning: (ASA ruleset)

1-2 count on the batter with 1 out. F1 pitches a legal pitch, but upon the release hits her hip with her pitching hand causing an 'errant' pitch (although legal) This pitch takes 1 bounce about 15 feet in front of the pitching rubber (aprox 28 feet from home plate) and continues in flight towards home plate. As the ball crosses home plate, B1 swings and misses the pitched ball. F2 catches the ball 'cleanly' after the swing and miss.

Is the D3K in effect?

The 'debate' for some, was that when the ball touched the ground, the pitch was not a 'strike' yet, so the D3K would not be in effect.

My ruling would have been that yes it is a D3K as the rule does not define 'when' a strike is called as a factor, but that the result of the pitch is a strike and the ball had touched the ground before being caught by F2.

thoughts?

(side bar: 'that' partner had no D3K because in his words 'the catcher caught the ball' )
This was on the ASA exam about 3 years ago. Or possibly it was the variant that if the ball is foul tipped then it is not a D3K.
________
ShaggMyPussy

Last edited by youngump; Mon Sep 19, 2011 at 07:40pm.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 23, 2010, 01:36pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Some officials have 20 years experience. Others have 1 year of experience 20 times.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 23, 2010, 02:03pm
GrumpUmp
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
If this were Facebook I'd give this a thumbs up.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 23, 2010, 03:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 297
I had one of "those" umpire partner's once.

Men's Open Slow Pitch Tournament.

This "umpire" made 4 "out/safe" calls on one batted ball. Scary I know. But that isn't the best part. Later in the game, runners on 1st and 3rd with one out. Right handed batter hits a smash down the 1st base line which hits the base and bounces into foul territory. He immediately yells "Foul ball!!!" Anyone have an idea on what to do with this one?
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Thu Dec 23, 2010, 04:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: East Central, FL
Posts: 1,042
Speaking of College Look....
Anyone on this board (besides me) working Rising Stars in FL Jan. 7-9?

or did last year scare ya'll away??
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Working with (not against) your partner LIUmp Softball 18 Sat May 22, 2010 06:30am
Moving Up / Working with Same Partner PeteBooth Baseball 8 Wed May 19, 2010 10:55am
Working with a bad partner. gordon30307 Baseball 19 Fri Aug 25, 2006 10:07am
Working with a weaker partner Andy Softball 6 Fri Aug 11, 2006 02:33pm
Working with an inexperienced partner. Douglas Weaver Basketball 4 Wed Dec 22, 1999 02:51pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:47pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1