|
Fri Apr 23, 2010, 11:20am
|
|||
|
|||
|
I really don't see the need. When you take a change, you make the change. Why would it be necessary to provide extraneous explanation for something that isn't supposed to be available to begin.
Of course, you could always go this route: Coach: 24 is going to hit for 13. 13 will re-enter. Umpire: Coach, give me the change when it happens. Coach: I just did. Umpire: Fine, coach. 24 is back in the game and 13 has used one of their two entries into the game. Any other players you would like to waste? Coach: But...uh...no...I didn't.....what? Umpire: Thanks, Coach, the dugout is that way.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. 
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pinch runner for a courtesy runner? | jwwashburn | Softball | 17 | Wed May 02, 2007 01:43pm |
| Courtesy Runner | rocker45 | Softball | 14 | Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:03am |
| NSA courtesy runner | Little Jimmy | Softball | 4 | Tue Jul 05, 2005 07:59am |
| Fed - Courtesy Runner | joemoore | Baseball | 12 | Mon Apr 12, 2004 08:28am |
| Courtesy Runner | whiskers_ump | Softball | 23 | Sat Nov 03, 2001 11:35am |
Threaded Mode
