The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Mar 11, 2010, 08:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 937
Question on NCAA 10.2.3

PITCHING PROCEDURE
10.2 Taking the signal from the catcher

10.2.3 After receiving the catcher's signal, the pitcher's hands must come together in view of the plate umpire for not more than five seconds.
Note: The hands do not have to come to a complete stop and, therefore, may be moving during the touch.

EFFECT-A ball is awarded to the batter.

My question....why is this not called an illegal pitch, as are other violations of the PITCHING PROCEDURE?
Book states: EFFECT (10.2.1-10.2.2)-Illegal pitch.

If there's an obvious answer/reason/logic as to why it is not called an illegal pitch...I don't see it. Please point out to me what I'm missing here.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 12, 2010, 02:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Live Free or Die Country
Posts: 175
Send a message via Yahoo to CelticNHBlue
Quote:
Originally Posted by KJUmp View Post
PITCHING PROCEDURE
10.2 Taking the signal from the catcher

10.2.3 After receiving the catcher's signal, the pitcher's hands must come together in view of the plate umpire for not more than five seconds.
Note: The hands do not have to come to a complete stop and, therefore, may be moving during the touch.

EFFECT-A ball is awarded to the batter.

My question....why is this not called an illegal pitch, as are other violations of the PITCHING PROCEDURE?
Book states: EFFECT (10.2.1-10.2.2)-Illegal pitch.

If there's an obvious answer/reason/logic as to why it is not called an illegal pitch...I don't see it. Please point out to me what I'm missing here.

Thanks.
This is a violation of the time between pitches rule and not the pitching motion.
__________________
Wade Ireland
Softball Umpire
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 12, 2010, 02:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Upstate, SC
Posts: 440
i.e. it is the analogue of the batter getting a strike for not taking her position in the batter's box.
__________________
Just Tryin' to Learn...
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Mar 12, 2010, 05:40pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 937
Quote:
Originally Posted by JefferMC View Post
i.e. it is the analogue of the batter getting a strike for not taking her position in the batter's box.
Jeffer/Celtic....
Got it. Now it makes sense to me.
Thanks for clarifying.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCAA Rule change? - Question #57 NCAA Test ljudge Football 2 Wed Jun 04, 2008 10:21am
NCAA question JS 20 Basketball 22 Tue Jan 08, 2008 02:04pm
NCAA question voiceoflg Baseball 3 Thu Apr 26, 2007 08:52am
NCAA Question dumbref Football 9 Wed Nov 09, 2005 01:41pm
NCAA, Question 50 FVB9 Baseball 11 Mon Mar 28, 2005 09:56pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:37am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1