![]() |
|
|||
Yep so much easier
Quote:
R1 on third; R2 on first; 2 outs. B3 hits a double between center and left field. R2 misses 2nd on the way to 3rd base. R1 scores. Does the run score if the defense properly appeals. Version 2 Runners at first and third and 2 outs. B3 hits a double between center and left field. R1 misses 2nd on the way to 3rd base. R3 scores. Does the run score if the defense properly appeals. Now, is version 1 really so much easier? I don't believe so. I understand both versions. It's not as some have suggested that we can't understand it. Just because someone criticizes the current system doesn't mean we can't use it and don't understand it. There's no logically reason for version 1. Mike, you say that in softball we have to designate them just one time, implying that version 2 requires us to change their designation. This is not true. In a given case play we don't have to change their designation as the play goes on. It is much more logical to have R1 mean the runner on 1st.
__________________
Gwinnett Umpires Association Multicounty Softball Association Multicounty Basketball Officials Association |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Identifying illegal back row attacks | BearBoy | Volleyball | 46 | Tue Sep 16, 2008 11:09pm |
Where do the runners go? | umpire99 | Baseball | 11 | Mon Mar 26, 2007 09:35pm |
Two Runners at First | cmcramer | Baseball | 7 | Wed Aug 16, 2006 01:44pm |
Runners on first and second | rodneyw | Baseball | 6 | Sun Mar 12, 2006 08:05am |
Runners gone haywire | Yeggman | Softball | 12 | Thu Mar 11, 2004 09:09am |