![]() |
|
|
|||
looking a BR only here...
I'm with a couple of you thinking I had this, but the more I read, the cloudier it gets.
One thing a recall from the National Umpire School training last March: if interference is called, there has to be an out somewhere, possibly two given certain conditions. A foul popup on which F1, F2, or F3 is hindered by the batter [becoming a batter-runner because no one should be waiting for the ball to land] should be called interference. I think the issue is a ground ball that is rolling along the 1B line. I know: If the BR contacts the ball in fair territory, the BR is out; if the BR contacts the ball in foul territory [accidentally or intentionally], the ball is ruled foul. There was a situation posted several back where the BR and F1 collided while the ball was currently in foul territory and without being touched, and after BR reached 1B rolled back and settled in fair territory. I guess I'm with several that wonder if that's interference. I also wonder if it might be obstruction since F1 was in the basepath without the ball in her possession. In a similar but slightly different twist, batter hits a chopper off home plate that bounces very high down the 1B line. F3 is straddling the base line waiting for the ball to come down. Before she gets possession, the BR runs into her causing F3 to misplay the ball. F3 was attempting to make a play on a ground ball, and according to rule, if it's a fair ball it's a play, but if it's a foul ball, there can be no play. So after contact, if PU determines the ball was over foul territory, no play, incidental contact, foul ball, batter returns. But if PU determines ball was over fair territory, obstruction, interference, or nothing? I've always been of the opinion that the BR must go around the fielder attempting to make a play [without going down that mink-lined definitional rathole]. Unless the fielder has the ball in her possession, and then the BR could be called out for running outside the basepath. Ted |
|
|||
It would only be obstruction if you were ruling that a different fielder was the one who had the play on the ball. As long as F1 is the fielder making the play on the batted ball, she cannot commit obstruction.
__________________
Tom |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Whats the call | justcallmeblue | Softball | 28 | Wed Jul 09, 2008 12:50am |
Whats the call? | veg4 | Baseball | 1 | Mon Aug 15, 2005 01:15pm |
whats the call? | wilkey1979 | Basketball | 7 | Wed Feb 25, 2004 09:03am |
Whats the call? | Ricejock | Softball | 2 | Sat Apr 20, 2002 10:24am |
Another ASA whats the call | Gulf Coast Blue | Softball | 3 | Sat Feb 03, 2001 11:29am |