The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 09:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem View Post
Look guy, one day a bunch of dudes sat around with iced tap water, cute matching shirts, and old coffee and talked about rules and they passed some rules and those are the rules. Some you agree with, some you dont. We do our job.

WTF over?
It's a harmless question "guy". If this is the best answer you can fashion, maybe you should read more and type less.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 09:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by topper View Post
It's a harmless question "guy". If this is the best answer you can fashion, maybe you should read more and type less.
Ya know, I think I will do the same. Not hard to delete posts, not that they would be missed. Ciao!
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 09:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sierra Nevada Mtns
Posts: 3,220
Quote:
Originally Posted by topper View Post
It's a harmless question "guy". If this is the best answer you can fashion, maybe you should read more and type less.
HA! Says the guy who didnt read the rule book before he posted the question.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 09:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem View Post
HA! Says the guy who didnt read the rule book before he posted the question.
Whatever.

Let's start over.

Why would any code punish the defense and not the offense for a similar act such as this.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Thu Nov 13, 2008, 11:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by topper View Post
Whatever.

Let's start over.

Why would any code punish the defense and not the offense for a similar act such as this.
F2 not returning the ball to F1 is punished for delaying the game and a ball is awarded the batter. A similiar act by the offense could be a batter not entering the batter's box in the allowed time and the strike being added to the count as punishment.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 14, 2008, 01:48am
SRW SRW is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by topper View Post
Why would any code punish the defense and not the offense for a similar act such as this.
Obviously the acts you are trying to compare are not so similiar. If they were, they would be "punished" in similiar manners, as you are inferring. Perhaps you should re-think your question based on this, and what others have already posted.
__________________
We see with our eyes. Fans and parents see with their hearts.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 14, 2008, 08:03am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRW View Post
Obviously the acts you are trying to compare are not so similiar. If they were, they would be "punished" in similiar manners, as you are inferring. Perhaps you should re-think your question based on this, and what others have already posted.

Thanks AtlUmpSteve for answering my 1st question.

It's not that obvious that, setting Steve's situation aside, 2 players inadvertently losing the count and delaying the game is not similar. It seems that there is more onus placed on the defense to keep track of the count than the offense. JMO
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 14, 2008, 11:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by topper View Post
...It seems that there is more onus placed on the defense to keep track of the count than the offense. JMO
Absolutely that is true. Is it "fair"? BFOM, but it is the rule.

3-1 count, no outs, bases empty. Pitch is low, batter swings and misses, F2 controls the ball after it hits the dirt. Batter takes off for 1B as if it was a dropped 3K. F2 throws to F3.

Ball 4?
__________________
Tom

Last edited by Dakota; Fri Nov 14, 2008 at 12:25pm.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 14, 2008, 11:42am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 4,387
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
Absolutely that is true. Is it "fair"? BFOM, but it is the rule.

1-3 count, no outs, bases empty. Pitch is low, batter swings and misses, F2 controls the ball after it hits the dirt. Batter takes off for 1B as if it was a dropped 3K. F2 throws to F3.

Ball 4?

I don't recall ever having a "1-3" count in my life!!!
__________________
Scott


It's a small world, but I wouldn't want to have to paint it.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Nov 14, 2008, 03:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dakota View Post
3-1 count, no outs, bases empty. Pitch is low, batter swings and misses, F2 controls the ball after it hits the dirt. Batter takes off for 1B as if it was a dropped 3K. F2 throws to F3.

Ball 4?
Is it ball 4? I don't have book at work but there is wording about when this is in effect (the ball on the batter penalty) is is limited to attempting to get a runner out? Or if there is a runner on base? Looking for the wording in this. Would it allow this throw to attempt to make a play on the batter-runner, which is a runner right? So I am asking since F2 was attempting to make a play on the BR would they be released from the must return to F1 rule?

Or taking it one step further is there any "release" from the F2 to F1 rule based on the actions of the batter-runner?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
college catcher warming up pitcher shipwreck Softball 15 Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:50am
Catcher sues baserunner for collision (co-ed ball) Dakota Softball 32 Thu Apr 19, 2007 01:14pm
catcher stepping and meeting the ball fastballbaker Baseball 1 Wed Oct 20, 2004 09:58am
Runner Knocks Ball From Catcher James V Softball 25 Tue Jun 15, 2004 08:47pm
Ball 4 Deflects off the Catcher GerryBlue Baseball 4 Mon Jul 28, 2003 02:21pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:41pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1