![]() |
|
|
|||
Quote:
I think you are confusing who he said is out. He is saying R1 is protected from the OBS. However, the BR (B2 in the original posting) is not protected since they were not OBS and the OBS had no bearing on their being out. Last edited by Dholloway1962; Mon Oct 20, 2008 at 10:23pm. Reason: spelling error |
|
|||
I don't think so. I see no mention of the BR in the OP or Irish's other than her hitting the ball to F4. Read it again.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
![]() Just to be clear, in the OP, it is problematical from the description given whether there even was obstruction (was R1 already retired?; was R1 saved from crash interference by F4 throwing the ball at the last second?...) But, if there WAS obstruction, it doesn't matter whether R1 was a dead duck. She is now not out, and is placed on 2B (if BR is safe) or back on 1B if BR was put out (again, assuming R1 would not have made 2B had there been no OBS).
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
not as much as this one
Quote:
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS |
|
|||
Quote:
You made a big error and you should do what I do when I make an error, you should beat yourself up over it so hopefully you dont do it again. It truly was a horrible call. F4 is either fielding a batted ball OR R1 is out. There is no nano second OBS from the moment of release of the throw to the moment of the catch by F6. Thats not the intent of the rules and I'm surprised anyone is making any comments to the contrary. This is not even OOO (which would be a best case situation for this scenario), this is a blown call. In fact, I'd say if F6 had missed the throw you might have gotten away with a freebie OOO int Out, which would be preferable to this horrible OBS call.
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS Last edited by wadeintothem; Tue Oct 21, 2008 at 10:00am. |
|
|||
Quote:
Now who's making things up? Did R1 running into F4 affect F6's ability to catch the ball even if it didn't affect the throw? When you make that call, please post it on here so others can bash you like you've bashed them. |
|
|||
Quote:
Luckily, there is no obstructed runner in this scenario, so that is moot. Quote:
![]()
__________________
ASA, NCAA, NFHS |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interference or Obstruction or Neither | David M | Baseball | 8 | Tue May 08, 2007 03:13pm |
Obstruction or interference | Carl Childress | Baseball | 119 | Sat Dec 03, 2005 02:21pm |
Interference / Obstruction/ Anything? | BigGref | Baseball | 8 | Thu Apr 21, 2005 09:33am |
interference vs obstruction... | thumpferee | Baseball | 2 | Mon May 24, 2004 07:33am |
Obstruction and Interference | spots101 | Baseball | 6 | Sun Mar 03, 2002 02:32pm |