The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 13, 2008, 05:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dukat View Post
Here is another DB situation question:

R1 on 1st. BR hits line shot to RF who fields it cleanly in the air for an out. She then tries to pick off R1 with a shot back to 1st and overthrows. The ball strikes the retired BR heading back to the dugout and ricochets off her leg toward the catcher. When R1 sees the ball hit and go off BR she runs to 2nd, the catcher retrieves the loose ball and then the play is over.

NFHS Slowpitch Ruleset.

What if anything needs to be done now?
Don't know about Fed, but in ASA that would be a blocked ball. That would be a dead ball, R1 is returned to 1B.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 13, 2008, 05:49pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
Don't know about Fed, but in ASA that would be a blocked ball. That would be a dead ball, R1 is returned to 1B.
Off a player? This must be one I don't understand very well. I thought only equipment could make a ball blocked. For a player I had interference or nothing. No?

If this is the case, why wouldn't the ball be blocked if after a (caught) strikeout the BR were hit with the ball while not interfering?
________
Brook live

Last edited by youngump; Mon Sep 19, 2011 at 06:28pm.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 13, 2008, 06:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by youngump View Post
Off a player? This must be one I don't understand very well. I thought only equipment could make a ball blocked. For a player I had interference or nothing. No?

If this is the case, why wouldn't the ball be blocked if after a (caught) strikeout the BR were hit with the ball while not interfering?
ASA 1 Definitions:

BLOCKED BALL: A batted, pitched or thrown ball that is touched, stopped or handled by a person not engaged in the game, or which touches loose equipment or any object that is not part of the official equipment or official playing area.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 13, 2008, 07:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fremont, NH
Posts: 1,388
I'm also wondering why this would be a dead ball. What if the ball had hit the 1B coach instead of the retired batter. Any difference?

Ted
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 13, 2008, 07:48pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
ASA 8-7.P makes it interference if an already retired or scored runner intentionally interferes; ASA 8-7.O makes it interference if a coach intentionally interferes. 8-7.O makes it clear that if the ball unintentionally hits the coach, it is not interference; and we know an unintentional hitting of the coach is not a blocked ball, it remains live. Base coaches are "engaged in the game", and are given (my words) certain partial immunity from accidental interference (other than keeping a fielder from fielding a batted ball for an out).

We also state that runners that are put out are not expected to go "poof"; they are there engaged in the game, at least until they are out, and have (again, my words) partial immunity from accidental interference. Using an expected (if not specified) consistency, I have to conclude that an equally unintentional hitting of a retired runner would also not be a blocked ball, and the ball would remain live. Retired runners are, in my mind, also engaged in the game to some degree; they are expected to be on the field, but they cannot interfere with impunity. Just as the coaching box and batters box are not safe havens, there are no safe havens defined for retired runners; but they don't go poof.

Now, I will extend my personal definition of intentional in these cases to include failing to avoid or failing to attempt to avoid if either are reasonably to be expected; but don't believe I have a blocked ball here without interference.

JMO; no black and white support available either way.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 13, 2008, 08:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: north central Pa
Posts: 2,360
I agree with Steve's explanation and also think it's relevant to note that this situation was caused by a badly thrown ball by the defense. That's another part of the reasoning why I most likely have nothing but a live ball.
__________________
Steve M
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 13, 2008, 08:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 318
I second Steve's agreement with Steve.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 14, 2008, 07:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve View Post
ASA 8-7.P makes it interference if an already retired or scored runner intentionally interferes; ASA 8-7.O makes it interference if a coach intentionally interferes. 8-7.O makes it clear that if the ball unintentionally hits the coach, it is not interference; and we know an unintentional hitting of the coach is not a blocked ball, it remains live. Base coaches are "engaged in the game", and are given (my words) certain partial immunity from accidental interference (other than keeping a fielder from fielding a batted ball for an out).

We also state that runners that are put out are not expected to go "poof"; they are there engaged in the game, at least until they are out, and have (again, my words) partial immunity from accidental interference. Using an expected (if not specified) consistency, I have to conclude that an equally unintentional hitting of a retired runner would also not be a blocked ball, and the ball would remain live. Retired runners are, in my mind, also engaged in the game to some degree; they are expected to be on the field, but they cannot interfere with impunity. Just as the coaching box and batters box are not safe havens, there are no safe havens defined for retired runners; but they don't go poof.

Now, I will extend my personal definition of intentional in these cases to include failing to avoid or failing to attempt to avoid if either are reasonably to be expected; but don't believe I have a blocked ball here without interference.

JMO; no black and white support available either way.
I don't disagree with anything Steve has posted. However, my opinion is based upon these five simple words "heading back to the dugout".

Even if you consider the retired player still engaged in the game, then they need to be "engaged" in the game. A retired offensive player has an obligation to be aware of and avoid being involved with continuing play. Being put out does not give a player Carte Blanche to just pop up and go to wherever it is s/he wants to go.

If a runner was forced at 2B on the front end of a 6-4-3 double play, popped up and enroute to the 3B dugout was hit by a throw back to pick-off a runner on 3B, we would be calling interference. If the catcher was chasing the ball and got tangled up with the retired player keeping her from making a play with a runner on the move, would that also be a live ball and play on?

We are not discussing a coach or runner going "poof" in the base line as the rules protect them because they are where they are supposed to be. Even the ODB stationed in a designated area is not protected and must avoid interfering with a live ball.

I can probably offer a dozen or more "what ifs", but there is no reason to waste the keystrokes.

Obviously, every scenario is an HTBT situation, but in this case, based on the information given, I'll stand on the blocked ball.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 14, 2008, 09:56am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Woodstock, GA; Atlanta area
Posts: 2,822
HTBT, absolutely. That's the "partial immunity". We don't seem to be disgreeing on the concept, just how we envision the described play in the OP.

When I think NFHS slowpitch, I think a fairly small field, at least so far as foul ball territory in the infield. I envision the overthrow of 1st traveling 10-15 feet beyond F3 when it hits the retired BR, who had little or no opportunity to react, and no reason to not head toward her dugout entrance after the fly is caught.

It seems like you envision a more open field with more foul ball territory, a retired batter-runner paying no attention and just wandering aimlessly in foul ball territory without paying attention, that had plenty of chance to avoid the overthrow, but didn't.

HTBT.
__________________
Steve
ASA/ISF/NCAA/NFHS/PGF
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 13, 2008, 07:37pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 67
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
ASA 1 Definitions:

BLOCKED BALL: A batted, pitched or thrown ball that is touched, stopped or handled by a person not engaged in the game, or which touches loose equipment or any object that is not part of the official equipment or official playing area.
It hit a retired runner who is a part of the game in my opinion. If it wasn't intentional I've got a big fat nothin'
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 13, 2008, 10:56pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Back in TX, formerly Seattle area
Posts: 1,279
Blocked ball...one of my favorite rules. Unlike the "look back" rule, the blocked ball rule has stayed true to its century-plus-old roots.
__________________
John
An ucking fidiot
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Oct 14, 2008, 12:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 262
If this were to cause a dead ball, it would sent the game to "kick ball" status.
Runners running around the bases? Simply fire one at the retired BR and all will stop....................... I think not. Therefore, no blocked ball, no interference, no dead ball.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NCAA Dead Ball Foul Question HawkeyeCubP Football 10 Tue Dec 05, 2006 06:43pm
dead ball question cloverdale Football 8 Fri Sep 01, 2006 04:33pm
Dead ball strike question? 3afan Softball 5 Thu Sep 23, 2004 03:23pm
NCAA question...dead ball offsetting? sloth Football 2 Tue Dec 16, 2003 10:16pm
Legally putting ball in play, dead ball violations BJ Moose Baseball 20 Tue Aug 26, 2003 10:09am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:44pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1