![]()  | 
	
		
			
  | 
	|||||||
![]()  | 
	
	
| 
		 | 
	
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes | 
| 
	 | 
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
			
			 
				
				.02
			 
			
			
			The stance, itself, is slightly noticeable, but I think the way they get back to a normal standing position after each pitch (not batted or wild/passed) is what looks ridiculous and sticks out poorly - move each foot six-ten inches in, back and forth, until feet are normal width apart again = very jerky. 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	But not much sillier-looking by comparison, in my opinion, than navy, flat-front pants.  
		 | 
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
		
	
		
		
		
		 
			
			I have to use it for some of the adult women.  If I happen to do FP or Co-Ed SP, there are some sort women that play in my area (one young lady is like 4'10", and I'm 6'1").  Heck, my partner one night was a guy who is 6'6", and he was hurting behind the plate!
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 | 
![]()  | 
	
	
| Bookmarks | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread | 
		
  | 
	
		 | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| When theory becomes reality (Correct throw-in spot) | BayStateRef | Basketball | 3 | Mon Jan 22, 2007 04:40pm | 
| Conspiracy Theory | mick | Basketball | 2 | Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:41pm | 
| Umpiring theory | CecilOne | Softball | 13 | Wed Jun 08, 2005 02:42pm | 
| Theory and Practice | Nevadaref | Basketball | 25 | Sat Jan 01, 2005 12:42pm | 
| Theory behind the muffed punt...? | EricSeattle | Football | 8 | Mon Oct 18, 2004 03:10pm |