![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|||
.02
The stance, itself, is slightly noticeable, but I think the way they get back to a normal standing position after each pitch (not batted or wild/passed) is what looks ridiculous and sticks out poorly - move each foot six-ten inches in, back and forth, until feet are normal width apart again = very jerky.
But not much sillier-looking by comparison, in my opinion, than navy, flat-front pants. ![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When theory becomes reality (Correct throw-in spot) | BayStateRef | Basketball | 3 | Mon Jan 22, 2007 04:40pm |
Conspiracy Theory | mick | Basketball | 2 | Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:41pm |
Umpiring theory | CecilOne | Softball | 13 | Wed Jun 08, 2005 02:42pm |
Theory and Practice | Nevadaref | Basketball | 25 | Sat Jan 01, 2005 12:42pm |
Theory behind the muffed punt...? | EricSeattle | Football | 8 | Mon Oct 18, 2004 03:10pm |