The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 25, 2007, 10:52pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 164
Interference with R2 and F6

What criteria do you guys use for ruling interference when a runner from second runs in front of the shortstop as a ground ball is approaching F6, assuming that there is no contact?

I have had plays where R2 was so close to F6 that F6 couldnt optimally position herself to field the ball, e.g. couldn't extend her arms or take an extra step in.

I've had plays where F6 can get into fielding position, but is visually screened by R2 for a split second as R2 passes by. Sometimes F6 cleanly fields the ball to boot.

Are these types of plays interference? Do you ever call interference if the ball is cleanly fielded even though the runner was right in front of F6 as the ball approached?

Do coaches tell their girls to run behing the shortstop in such situations.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 25, 2007, 11:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
Interference is the act of an offensive team member that hinders the defensive player's ability to make a play on a runner. The key word for me is "hinders." Did the runner's actions or position force the defensive player to adjust their throw? Did the runner's actions or position force the defensive player to stop prematurely? Did the runner's actions or position force the defensive player to hesitate?

If I'm going to call a runner out for interference, I'd better be absolutely positive that it was, indeed, interference. ASA took out the references to "intent" this year, and that has made the mind-reading game virtually non-existant. However, I will admit that the benefit of the doubt, for me, leans a little more towards the runner.

The rule is clearly defined, but whether or not it was interference is still a judgment call. My judgment is that if I don't see a clear deviation by the defensive player because of a hindering action by an offensive player, I don't have interference.

Coaches teach their players to play dirty? That's unheard of!
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 26, 2007, 01:38am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: north central Pa
Posts: 2,360
DTQ,
A lot of the answer to your question depends on the age group & skill level of the particular game. I'd expect a high school or older aged player to make that play. So, unless the runner did something to actually interfere, there's nothing there. The defensive player getting intimidated into not making a play just because of the presence of an offensive player doing what the offensive player should be doing is not interference.
__________________
Steve M
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 26, 2007, 03:41am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 382
In your descriptions I have interference .
Interference is hinders confuses impedes a player making a play .
Both these meet this criteria .
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 26, 2007, 06:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by debeau
In your descriptions I have interference .
Interference is hinders confuses impedes a player making a play .
Both these meet this criteria .
I don't agree with "visually screened by R2 for a split second as R2 passes by" being interference unless the runner does something other than run straight to the next base at full speed.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 26, 2007, 08:57am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by DTQ_Blue
What criteria do you guys use for ruling interference when a runner from second runs in front of the shortstop as a ground ball is approaching F6, assuming that there is no contact?

I have had plays where R2 was so close to F6 that F6 couldnt optimally position herself to field the ball, e.g. couldn't extend her arms or take an extra step in.
That is the fielder's fault for not taking her position. If she just sits back and waits on the ball, shame on her.
Quote:

I've had plays where F6 can get into fielding position, but is visually screened by R2 for a split second as R2 passes by. Sometimes F6 cleanly fields the ball to boot.

Are these types of plays interference? Do you ever call interference if the ball is cleanly fielded even though the runner was right in front of F6 as the ball approached?

Do coaches tell their girls to run behing the shortstop in such situations.
If the runner is doing what s/he is supposed to do, advancing to 3B, it is nothing. If the fielder stops, let's the ball pass and then continues, it is nothing. If the runner shows that there was more on her mind than advancing, you may have INT. If the runner hesitates and then moves in front of the fielder just as the ball arrives, that's INT. If the runner makes any motion not connected to her running style or screams as she passes, that is INT.

What it comes down to is that the runner's mere existence at the spot in time is not in itself interference.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 26, 2007, 03:30pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 382
AT the end of the day interference is JUDGEMENT .
What you describe and what actually happens in a split second often is slightly different but enough to be or not to be !
I would think though any umpire can explain their judgement decision to a coach .
A thought .
If you are unsure if it is or isnt interference it probably isnt .
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
interference jumpmaster Baseball 8 Wed Mar 29, 2006 11:12pm
Runner interference versus umpire interference Jay R Baseball 1 Thu Apr 28, 2005 07:00pm
Interference? KJ'sDAD Softball 13 Mon Dec 06, 2004 04:00pm
Interference WinterWillie Softball 3 Sat Jul 17, 2004 12:27pm
Interference jesmael Baseball 8 Fri Jun 14, 2002 11:20am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:43pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1