The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 19, 2007, 06:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
Yet another OBS scenario: base path and home plate

I know OBS comes up a lot on this forum, and pardon me for tossing this out there. However, I have one question for everyone...

Do you consider the base path to stop at home plate? Or do you consider the base path to be through it? Consider the following play...

R1 on 3rd, R2 on 2nd. No outs. B3 hits a pop fly ball to the outfield, easily caught by F9. Both runners tag up and attempt to advance to the next base. F9 throws to F2, who is standing just off the 1st base foul edge of home plate. B1, seeing F2's position and worrying about a possible collision, slows down enough to be noticed by PU. F2 then catches the ball, turns, and tags B1 on a very close play.

Would you have obstruction there? If not, at what point would you consider F2's location to be obstructing the runner? Actually on the edge of HP? In the middle of HP?

I'll post my answer later (and I promise I won't change it after reading everyone else's!).
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 19, 2007, 08:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:

Do you consider the base path to stop at home plate? Or do you consider the base path to be through it? Consider the following play...
Speaking ASA

By definition, no.

Quote:

R1 on 3rd, R2 on 2nd. No outs. B3 hits a pop fly ball to the outfield, easily caught by F9. Both runners tag up and attempt to advance to the next base. F9 throws to F2, who is standing just off the 1st base foul edge of home plate. B1, seeing F2's position and worrying about a possible collision, slows down enough to be noticed by PU. F2 then catches the ball, turns, and tags B1 on a very close play.
Remember, the rule is about impeding a runner's progress while not in possession of the ball, not the base path or anything else.
Quote:

Would you have obstruction there? If not, at what point would you consider F2's location to be obstructing the runner? Actually on the edge of HP? In the middle of HP?
Okay, again, F2's location is irrelevant. I doubt anyone here can actually say for certain if they would rule OBS without seeing the play. Personally, I think it would have to be seriously obvious before I ruled OBS on such a play.

I'll post my answer later (and I promise I won't change it after reading everyone else's!). [/quote]
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 19, 2007, 10:16pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 747
Quote:
Originally Posted by NCASAUmp
I know OBS comes up a lot on this forum, and pardon me for tossing this out there. However, I have one question for everyone...

Do you consider the base path to stop at home plate? Or do you consider the base path to be through it? Consider the following play...

R1 on 3rd, R2 on 2nd. No outs. B3 hits a pop fly ball to the outfield, easily caught by F9. Both runners tag up and attempt to advance to the next base. F9 throws to F2, who is standing just off the 1st base foul edge of home plate. B1, seeing F2's position and worrying about a possible collision, slows down enough to be noticed by PU. F2 then catches the ball, turns, and tags B1 on a very close play.

Would you have obstruction there? If not, at what point would you consider F2's location to be obstructing the runner? Actually on the edge of HP? In the middle of HP?

I'll post my answer later (and I promise I won't change it after reading everyone else's!).
There is nothing close to obstruction in this scenario.
There was stupidity in the case of the runner for slowing down.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 19, 2007, 11:38pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 561
Send a message via AIM to BoomerSooner
There are plenty of ways to avoid a collision in this situation without the runner slowing down to the point of being putout. The first thing that comes to mind is a well placed/timed slide. The way I look at OBS in a situation like this is there must be something that directly and necessarily influences the runners progress. If runner's progress is altered by her own concern for a collision and it turns out it wasn't necessary (this case is one example, another is at first base when a runner slows down to avoid contact when the fielder wasn't really in the way), I'm not calling OBS.

I can't sit out there and try to play the "well she slowed down because she thought she might run into the fielder, or the fielder was in the base path (when the runner was only halfway down the line) so that might have caused her to slow down resulting in an out". I'm going to look for something more concrete before I make the call.

When I played baseball, I was always taught to go hard, run the play out, and just let the umpires take care of the rest if something happened. Now I think coaches and players are so caught up in worrying about these things that used to be the domain of the umpires (like OBS and collisions).
__________________
My job is a decision-making job, and as a result, I make a lot of decisions." --George W. Bush
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 20, 2007, 03:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
"seeing F2's position and worrying about a possible collision, slows down " could be OBS if the fielder was actually risking collision by her position.

Sliding, slowing to turn away as soon as the plate is touched could be deviations.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sun May 20, 2007, 06:54pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: LA
Posts: 642
is it just me? or WTH is going on?.....
__________________
Will Rogers must not have ever officiated in Louisiana.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 21, 2007, 08:12am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
The OP provides an interesting question.

If a fielder beyond the base/plate but in the extended/continued "base path" of the runner, and close enough to the base/plate to not allow avoidance after the base/plate is OBS?

Of course, the corollary question is if the runner does not deviate, is colliding with the fielder after the base/plate subject to the same criteria as before the base for interference or malicious contact?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 21, 2007, 08:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
I don't believe I would call OBS on this play. I don't believe I'd even think about it.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 21, 2007, 11:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Texas
Posts: 429
Thumbs up

I had an OBS at HP in a 16U Friendly yesterday ... catcher was clearly blocking the plate ... I have OBS ... she catches the throw tags runner out .... after the play I announce the OBS, award the runner home - and here comes the coach, running towards me - she is not happy.

but, to my amazement she stops and tears into her catcher for blocking the plate without the ball.

miracles do happen !!!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 21, 2007, 11:54am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9
As OP, how can this not be OBS? A player without the ball caused the runner to deviate from her path. The rule does not have a clause that reads" unless there are other ways to get to the base". Now if the player was far enough from the plate that I judged there was no way she caused the runner to deviate, that would be different.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 21, 2007, 12:34pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3afan
I had an OBS at HP in a 16U Friendly yesterday ... catcher was clearly blocking the plate ... I have OBS ... she catches the throw tags runner out .... after the play I announce the OBS, award the runner home - and here comes the coach, running towards me - she is not happy.

but, to my amazement she stops and tears into her catcher for blocking the plate without the ball.

miracles do happen !!!
Did he wait for you to call time? Did you count this as a defensive conference?
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 21, 2007, 12:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Little Elm, TX (NW Dallas)
Posts: 4,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by kblump
As OP, how can this not be OBS? A player without the ball caused the runner to deviate from her path. The rule does not have a clause that reads" unless there are other ways to get to the base". Now if the player was far enough from the plate that I judged there was no way she caused the runner to deviate, that would be different.
You're only looking at half of the rule. I grant that you are looking at the half that most people forget ... but you are forgetting the half that everyone else remembers.
__________________
"Many baseball fans look upon an umpire as a sort of necessary evil to the luxury of baseball, like the odor that follows an automobile." - Hall of Fame Pitcher Christy Mathewson
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Mon May 21, 2007, 12:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrowder
You're only looking at half of the rule. I grant that you are looking at the half that most people forget ... but you are forgetting the half that everyone else remembers.
F2 is not in possesion of the ball and is not fielding a batted ball and is impeding the progress of the runner who is legally running the bases (open for debate since we were not there). I give, what am I forgetting?
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 22, 2007, 12:43am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NC
Posts: 4,361
The way I would look at the OP is this... If the fielder does not have the ball, and their positioning causes the runner to deviate from their chosen path, then we would have obstruction, regardless of what side of the base they are on. Since home plate is inherently different from second and third (as a runner can touch it and run past it without being liable to be put out after passing it), I would dare argue both as a coach and an umpire that the runner's path can extend beyond the bag. If a fielder's positioning beyond HP affects the runner's ability to continue their chosen path (causing them to slow down, move aside, stutter their steps, etc.), then I would argue that OBS occured.

Mike (IRISHMAFIA) is correct in that this may just be one of those plays that you HTBT in order to see it. However, after chatting with other blues on this one, I got such a variety of answers that I had to see what others thought. I had one of my partners say, "if the runner has about 80% of the plate available to them, I'm not calling OBS."

What?! And here, I thought the runner had their choice...
__________________
Dave

I haven't decided if I should call it from the dugout or the outfield. Apparently, both have really great views!

Screw green, it ain't easy being blue!

I won't be coming here that much anymore. I might check in now and again.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue May 22, 2007, 07:09am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: North Texas
Posts: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrowder
Did he wait for you to call time? Did you count this as a defensive conference?
yes SHE did, and no I didnt --- she was gone by time I got done cleaning the plate .............. even if I did have do wait on her I would not have charged a conference, it was a "friendly" between 2 local teams
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Home Plate Stripes33 Softball 2 Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:27am
Running outside the base path WestMichBlue Softball 18 Tue Apr 19, 2005 08:22am
Coed slopitch and the plate line vs home plate SactoBlue Softball 14 Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:42am
Fielders set up in base path jprideaux Baseball 13 Sat Jul 03, 2004 04:26pm
Legal Base Path? Just Curious Softball 7 Tue Apr 09, 2002 12:08pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1