View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 19, 2007, 08:12pm
IRISHMAFIA IRISHMAFIA is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:

Do you consider the base path to stop at home plate? Or do you consider the base path to be through it? Consider the following play...
Speaking ASA

By definition, no.

Quote:

R1 on 3rd, R2 on 2nd. No outs. B3 hits a pop fly ball to the outfield, easily caught by F9. Both runners tag up and attempt to advance to the next base. F9 throws to F2, who is standing just off the 1st base foul edge of home plate. B1, seeing F2's position and worrying about a possible collision, slows down enough to be noticed by PU. F2 then catches the ball, turns, and tags B1 on a very close play.
Remember, the rule is about impeding a runner's progress while not in possession of the ball, not the base path or anything else.
Quote:

Would you have obstruction there? If not, at what point would you consider F2's location to be obstructing the runner? Actually on the edge of HP? In the middle of HP?
Okay, again, F2's location is irrelevant. I doubt anyone here can actually say for certain if they would rule OBS without seeing the play. Personally, I think it would have to be seriously obvious before I ruled OBS on such a play.

I'll post my answer later (and I promise I won't change it after reading everyone else's!). [/quote]
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote