The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Wed Nov 01, 2006, 03:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 8,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrowder
My problem with the definition of play is that there will be people who imply that it is no longer interference on a runner if she contacts a fielder who is fielding a batted ball, and there is no chance for an out on BR...
I don't read this as an implication of this proposed change --- it is a direct effect of this proposed change. No chance of an out - no play. No play, no interference.

This is a very bad change. Hopefully, the committee will see that.
__________________
Tom
Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
National Federation rule chances for 2007 Carl Childress Baseball 70 Tue Feb 06, 2007 09:06am
2007 ASA Stuff SRW Softball 1 Fri Oct 27, 2006 05:55pm
2007 NCAA rules Lotto Basketball 7 Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:23am
Clinic for 2007 Season Hoosier_Dave Softball 8 Thu Jul 13, 2006 09:30am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:06am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1