![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
This play is really making the rounds! I have seen five different variations of this scenario on five different discussion boards in the past week.
An interesting non-softball footnote: This same question came up a few days ago on the webpage run by my local baseball umpire association. They have a "Stump the Ump" board where members can submit questions to our associations rule interpretor. Our interpretor admitted that he was stumped! The question was forwarded to Kyle McNeely on the NFHS national rules committee for clarification. The word we got was that on a ball that becomes foul, the passing runner is not out. Now, from a softball point of view: I would also tend to say that the runner is not out. I would base this on NFHS rule 8-5-1 and ASA rule 8-6-A, both of which state that runners must return to their base when a batted ball is foul. Kind of hard to comply with that rule if you've declared the runner out! Since the ball has been declared foul, no advance of the runners is possible. If no advance is possible, how can we call a runner out for advancing illegally? |
|
|||
|
Here's the problem with returning the runner. What runner are you going to return? S/he's no longer a runner because, by rule, THEY have already been declared out.
![]() ASA Case Book Plays 8.8-15 & 8.8-17 notes that even though an over-the-fence HR is a dead ball, runners still may not pass each other and the passing runner will be declared out. That settles the live/dead ball discussion. Now, the question becomes the fair/foul issue. Since no runners may advance on a foul ball of any sort, I believe a passing runner should not be declared out. Therefore, I will offer the following rule change to ASA for the 2007 season: Runner is out Add 8.7.D EXCEPTION: When on a batted ball which is declared foul Affects POE #39
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
|
Foul ball, nobody out, runners return (same as in OBR). Just as you call the batter out on the IFR and then negate the call if the ball becomes foul. Just as you ignore the OBS if BR who has hit a long fly is obstructed while rounding 1B before the ball is caught.
Of course, anything is possible in a code that (1) permits a BR who hits a bases-loaded, no-out pop toward 1B to collide intentionally with F3 to break up a double play, and (2) still allows the run to score if the runner from 3B had touched home before the collision. So I offer another rule change: "If the BR has not touched 1B at the time of the interference, each runner shall return to the base legally occupied at the time of the pitch."
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! |
|
|||
|
Getting Back on Topic...
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Tom |
|
|||
|
If a runner passes another runner on a foul ball in one of my games, I'm returning all runners. This year. But since the book isn't 100% clear, I'd support Mike's suggested addition. However, I suspect that ASA's current interpretation would be simply foul ball, runners return. (But who knows for sure?)
Also: the [OBS] rule is also clear that you only award the base that would have been reached absent the OBS Abel on 2B, Baker on 1B, 2 out. Charles smashes a one-hopper to F5, who gloves it two steps from 3B. F6 obstucts Abel, 50 feet from 3B, a half second before F5 steps on 3B for the force on Abel. In ASA, the ball is dead as soon as Abel is put out. Abel is awarded 3B, Baker goes to 2B, and Charles goes to 1B. The fact that absent the OBS, Abel was out by a mile is irrelevant. The OBS overrides the fielding play. So we could also argue, if we take the book literally, that OBS during a fly ball that is eventually caught also overrides the catch. After all, in Fed, a call of "foul" on a pop fly eventually caught overrides the action on the field. The catch is nullified, and the ball is foul. I think that if we take the book 100% literally, we could come up will any number of rules that umpires routinely contradict. Abel on 2B is the winning run in the bottom of the 7th. Baker gets a hit to left field and Abel tries to score ahead of F7's throw. So that he can direct Abel in his approach to the plate, Charles, the on-deck batter, places himself in foul territory 15 feet behind home plate on the direct line from 3B through home. F7's throw is in the dirt, deflects off F2's knee, and hits Charles just before Abel's foot touches the plate. OK, guys. The book is to be taken 100% literally. That's a blocked ball by the offense. Abel back to 3B.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Wouldn't that depend on whether the ODB was engaged in the game? The ODB, by rule, is permitted to leave the ODC to direct a runner. To me, that sounds like the ODB is performing a duty which is part of the game. Can that be considered "engaged" in the game? If so, it is nothing UNLESS, in the umpire's judgment, deprives the defense's ability to make an out.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
|
__________________
Mark NFHS, NCAA, NAFA "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" Anton Chigurh - "No Country for Old Men" |
|
|||
|
Wouldn't that depend on whether the ODB was engaged in the game?
True. If this play ever occurs (and somebody actually comes to me with the claim that it's a blocked ball), I'll use "engaged in the game" as my refutation. Thanks. Now let's work on how to prevent a team from benefiting from committing deliberate interference.
__________________
greymule More whiskey—and fresh horses for my men! Roll Tide! |
|
|||
|
Rule is live ball.
We are looking for outs folks.lol Since the rule states passing during a live ball situation, the runner should be declared out and if foul returning the remaining runners to the base occupied TOP, until the rule changes. Where's Henry and Merle when you need them? Why should we reward stupid baserunning?
__________________
Joe Herzer Dallas, TX DSUA |
|
|||
|
Think about this. How many times have we seen one runner haul *** around 1B on a ball down the LF line, but R1 doesn't move because s/he can see it is obviously going foul. Everyone knows it's going to be foul, even the softball mom in the concession stand. BUT, because the batter just passed R1, you are going to call the runner out for just doing what s/he is supposed to do since the ball was still in flight at the time of the passing?
I'm not.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Mark NFHS, NCAA, NAFA "If the rule you followed brought you to this, of what use was the rule?" Anton Chigurh - "No Country for Old Men" |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| From another board | Tbone | Football | 4 | Fri Aug 01, 2003 03:56pm |
| Some cute spring league comments | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 0 | Sat May 11, 2002 08:11pm |
| Just Cute or BS! | BKS | Basketball | 3 | Tue Feb 19, 2002 01:41pm |
| One more "Cute Kid" saying | rainmaker | Basketball | 1 | Mon Feb 18, 2002 03:26pm |
| Cute player comment | Mark Padgett | Basketball | 3 | Tue Jan 08, 2002 03:17pm |