![]() |
|
|||
|
Interference requires a play to be interfered with.
But, the knock down hindered the fielder's ability to make a play on R1 when R1 advanced or even if R1 did not advance. * Some interference instances have a delayed effect, not necessarily immediate. It looks like this is that type of case and so interference applies. The call should have been at the moment of collision, then judge whether the possible double play fits. Hard to call, hard to explain, but "big bucks". * Think pickoff or throw home to prevent the score.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT. It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be. |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Runner collides with on deck batter | Gmoore | Softball | 18 | Wed Apr 23, 2014 07:04pm |
| fair/foul - then catch/no-catch | David Emerling | Baseball | 36 | Tue May 07, 2013 08:58am |
| Ref Collides with Player who has the Ball | cshs81 | Basketball | 5 | Fri Feb 08, 2008 07:54am |
| Catch or no catch(foul ball)? | illiniwek8 | Baseball | 2 | Sat Mar 25, 2006 07:16pm |