The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Interference by R1 on foul fly? Interference by R1 on foul fly?
Register FAQ Members List Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 19, 2017, 05:32pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago area, Illinois
Posts: 71
Send a message via ICQ to falsecut Send a message via AIM to falsecut Send a message via Yahoo to falsecut
Interference by R1 on foul fly?
FED rules. Three man game. R1 standing on third base when pop foul happens. 3B runs in front of R1 which is not the direct path. Ball drops foul. U3 no call but PU calls R1 out for interference. Says it doesn't matter that runner was in contact with base. Runner was stock still. Opinions? Even better would be rule based comments


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Craig
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri May 19, 2017, 05:48pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 187
Quote:
Originally Posted by falsecut View Post
FED rules. Three man game. R1 standing on third base when pop foul happens. 3B runs in front of R1 which is not the direct path. Ball drops foul. U3 no call but PU calls R1 out for interference. Says it doesn't matter that runner was in contact with base. Runner was stock still. Opinions? Even better would be rule based comments


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No interference unless intentional.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 20, 2017, 06:57am
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by MT 73 View Post
No interference unless intentional.
Even if the PU judged F5's non-direct route to be because of R1.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 20, 2017, 12:50pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago area, Illinois
Posts: 71
Send a message via ICQ to falsecut Send a message via AIM to falsecut Send a message via Yahoo to falsecut
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
Even if the PU judged F5's non-direct route to be because of R1.


That was PUs contention. I'm trying to provide some rule support for this ruling which I figured PU kicked. Seems like one of those "legal because it doesn't say it isn't " type of situations. I wasn't at the game but got asked a question.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Craig
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 20, 2017, 02:14pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,640
Rule 8-8-13 tells us that a runner is not out if she is in contact with a base unless her interference with the fielder is intentional. The runner doesn't need to vacate the base or move out of the way, and just standing in one spot without moving is not "intentionally interfering".
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 20, 2017, 04:57pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
Even if the PU judged F5's non-direct route to be because of R1.
If the runner is in contact with the base at the time of the alleged INT, what difference does it make how they got there?
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 20, 2017, 05:06pm
Official Forum Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA View Post
If the runner is in contact with the base at the time of the alleged INT, what difference does it make how they got there?
None, just confirming/expanding MT73 post #2, not a question.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Linear Mode
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interference on pop up foul Insane Blue Softball 25 Thu Apr 23, 2015 04:41pm
Interference - Foul fly Zepp Softball 10 Tue May 28, 2013 01:37pm
Interference with foul fly MD Longhorn Softball 2 Mon May 21, 2012 02:49pm
Foul interference? Shmuelg Baseball 12 Tue Jun 26, 2007 06:46am
Interference vs Fair/Foul mcrowder Softball 25 Sun May 14, 2006 07:32pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:26pm.

The Official Forum - Archive - Top


Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1