View Single Post
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sat May 20, 2017, 06:57am
CecilOne CecilOne is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by MT 73 View Post
No interference unless intentional.
Even if the PU judged F5's non-direct route to be because of R1.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote