The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 03, 2016, 11:06am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Thrown ball INT ??

I know we have discussed this before, but a new example, just to clarify.

Bases loaded, batted (bunted ?) ball along 1st base line, fielded by F3 in front of 1st; who throws home for the force.
BUT, the throw hits the BR, deflecting the ball.

1 – Is it INT?
2 – If it is, why not INT whenever a throw hits a runner?

Primarily an ASA question; please add what you want about NCAA, NFHS or other differences.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 03, 2016, 11:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
Not unless the runner did something intentional to interfere with the throw, and the running lane only applies to plays at 1st base so no factor in the play as described.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 03, 2016, 11:51am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
Not unless the runner did something intentional to interfere with the throw, and the running lane only applies to plays at 1st base so no factor in the play as described.
Where is "intentional" in the book? I don't see that word in 8.2.F or 8.7/J.

Is it just that any INT has to be an "act"?
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 03, 2016, 11:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: The Land Of The Free and The Home Of The Brave (MD/DE)
Posts: 6,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by RKBUmp View Post
the running lane only applies to plays at 1st base so no factor in the play as described.
Obviously the running lane is irrelevant, please leave it out of comments.
__________________
Officiating takes more than OJT.
It's not our jobs to invent rulings to fit our personal idea of what should and should not be.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 03, 2016, 11:53am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 648
"only applies to plays at 1st base"

and, may I add, RKB, on a throw from the direction of HP (as opposed to up 3B line, and a throw pulling F3 toward HP)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 03, 2016, 12:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
I know we have discussed this before, but a new example, just to clarify.

Bases loaded, batted (bunted ?) ball along 1st base line, fielded by F3 in front of 1st; who throws home for the force.
BUT, the throw hits the BR, deflecting the ball.

1 – Is it INT?
2 – If it is, why not INT whenever a throw hits a runner?

Primarily an ASA question; please add what you want about NCAA, NFHS or other differences.
It isn't in any code.

Just as you wouldn't call a runner from first to second for interference on a throw (from F3) that hits her in the back.

Interfering with a thrown ball and being hit by a thrown ball are different.

For reference, I was part of a similar play this summer (not a bunt, hit to F3 in front of the bag), generating a lot of discussion in the umpire locker room.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 03, 2016, 12:28pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
Where is "intentional" in the book? I don't see that word in 8.2.F or 8.7/J.

Is it just that any INT has to be an "act"?
This isn't kickball. You can't plunk the runner to get an out.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 03, 2016, 12:44pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
Where is "intentional" in the book? I don't see that word in 8.2.F or 8.7/J.

Is it just that any INT has to be an "act"?
Intentional isn't specified, but as you stated the runner must commit some act that actually interferes with the throw and simply running the bases as they are suppose to is not an act of interference. So short of doing something intentional such as reaching out with a hand to block the throw it is nothing.

And as for my comment about the running lane, I only mentioned it because discussions about throws between home and 1st or 1st and home always seems to bring up some discussion about the running lane.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 03, 2016, 01:13pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Slick View Post
It isn't in any code.

Just as you wouldn't call a runner from first to second for interference on a throw (from F3) that hits her in the back.

Interfering with a thrown ball and being hit by a thrown ball are different.

For reference, I was part of a similar play this summer (not a bunt, hit to F3 in front of the bag), generating a lot of discussion in the umpire locker room.
NCAA 12.2.13 and 12.8.5 (2014-2015 book) both have intent required on a thrown ball.
__________________
Rich Ives
Different does not equate to wrong
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 03, 2016, 01:27pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 14,565
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
This isn't kickball. You can't plunk the runner to get an out.
Couldn't convince me of that considering the plays I've seen in NCAA the past couple of years.
__________________
The bat issue in softball is as much about liability, insurance and litigation as it is about competition, inflated egos and softball.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Mon Oct 03, 2016, 02:11pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rich Ives View Post
NCAA 12.2.13 and 12.8.5 (2014-2015 book) both have intent required on a thrown ball.
Meaning it isn't Interference in any code, answering Cecil's question:

Quote:
Originally Posted by CecilOne View Post
I know we have discussed this before, but a new example, just to clarify.

Bases loaded, batted (bunted ?) ball along 1st base line, fielded by F3 in front of 1st; who throws home for the force.
BUT, the throw hits the BR, deflecting the ball.

1 – Is it INT?
No, his play is NOT interference in any code.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ball thrown into Dead ball territory MASS F/B UMP Softball 11 Mon May 04, 2009 11:32am
Thrown Elbow - Live Ball vs. Dead Ball rfp Basketball 19 Sun Nov 12, 2006 05:15am
Thrown ball into dead ball area 0balls2strikes Softball 7 Wed Aug 10, 2005 08:10pm
ODB Hit by Thrown Ball tzme415 Softball 9 Fri Jul 08, 2005 05:06pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:58pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1