The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Softball
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Aug 09, 2016, 02:47pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Honestly, this is an area the book is very much lacking.

In any other rule, if there is a term that is important to the enforcement of the rule, you can find that term defined in rule 1. "Infielder" is very vague. Every umpire's interpretation of the rule is going to differ on this one, and that's something we don't want.

Mike has hinted at one way some umpires would interpret it. I've come across some crazy ones.

Question for Mike - would you allow the following:

F3 (female) and F5 (male) playing inside the baseline about 2 steps.
F4 (female) and F6 (male) playing on the outfield grass about 10 yards.
F7 (female) and F10 (male) playing very near the foul lines, perhaps 5 yards deeper than F4 and F6.
F8 (male) and F9 (female) playing almost at the warning track, spread further wide than F4 and F6.

A local team used to line up this way. Some umpires would allow it, some not... they would invariably complain until they got their way, and then some UIC's would allow it, some not. Then some TD's yes, some no.

Biggest problem for me on this alignment was that they had, to my mind, 6 infielders, and while F10 was not closer to first base than F3 ... F10 could definitely make plays there, especially if the ball was hit to F1 or F5 (and moreso if the runner was slow).

Sometimes when someone argued the 6 infielder angle, they would move F4 and F6 back to be deeper than F7 and 10. Essentially all 4 "infielders" were on the foul lines, and all 4 "outfielders" closest to second base.

Sounds wonky - but they would shift around a lot based on the hitters, so defining who was what, exactly, for any given hitter was a nebulous thing.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Wed Aug 10, 2016, 10:34am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Glendale, AZ
Posts: 2,672
I think the definition of infielder and outfielder are intentionally vague, since in all other games besides co-ed, it doesn't really matter. Co Ed is the only game where a certain number of players have to be infielders and a certain number of players have to be outfielders. In any other game, only two defensive players are limited on where they have to be at the start of the play, the pitcher and catcher. The other seven can be anywhere in fair territory.

Looking at the defensive alignment detailed by MD, my first thought would be to allow it, but I would really need to see it as I'm having a hard time visualizing "F4 and F6 about 10 yards on the grass" and how that looks on the field.

It all comes down to umpire judgement and the team needs to realize that not every umpire may allow their defensive positioning and adjust accordingly.
__________________
It's what you learn after you think you know it all that's important!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASA 2013 BOO (non-coed) sbatten Softball 13 Wed Apr 17, 2013 01:15pm
Coed softball Rita C Softball 1 Wed Jun 27, 2012 11:46pm
SP coed rule?? ASA oppool Softball 6 Thu Aug 05, 2004 10:20am
ASA slowpitch coed positioning mgl_8 Softball 3 Wed Apr 30, 2003 02:07pm
Coed 4s League at CCC ebwvb Volleyball 0 Sun Feb 02, 2003 11:35pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:05pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1