![]() |
|
|||
Retired batter running as if it was D3K (ASA)
ASA changed the wording slightly of 8-7-N (I think "N"... don't have a book with me at the moment; it's the rule regarding a retired/scored runner continuing to run & drawing a throw, etc.) to say that the rule does not apply to a batter "entitled" to run on a D3K (to which I say, "Duh"... since such a batter is now a BR and is NOT retired, but that is not my point of the question)... it used to say merely that it did not apply to a runner running on the D3K rule.
So, now we have the word "entitled" in there (added last year? year before? I forget.) Is this a change in interpretation? If a batter strikes out and just takes off for 1B and F2 throws to F3, allowing R1 to steal a base, this was always DMC, and not ruled as interference. Is it now interference?
__________________
Tom |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Batter running on dropped third strike | PABlue | Baseball | 10 | Mon Jun 11, 2007 02:26pm |
Retired batter Interference | mcrowder | Baseball | 17 | Wed Aug 16, 2006 08:13pm |
Batter-Runner Running to first... | Chukinrox | Baseball | 15 | Wed Jul 26, 2006 08:33am |
Batter/Runner Outside Running Lane | blueump | Baseball | 8 | Sun Apr 16, 2006 09:03am |
Batter running on missed 3rd strike | WillSun | Baseball | 3 | Wed Apr 28, 2004 02:45pm |