Is bat illegal in NCAA?

[AtlUmpSteve]

Originally Posted by Dakota

Maybe someone can explain the logic behind this rule... until then... What a stupid rule!

That bat model is on the NCAA Approved bat list. So apparently it sufficiently contrasts.

Tom, the rule exists because several bats had colors so identical to the ball that players (and umpires!!) had difficulty seeing the ball off the bat; and the delay in recognizing the ball movement was considered a safety issue. Not a major brand, but I bet you can think of it.

well, they didn't outlaw the brand, just the color. I think it affected 1 or 2 other bats on the list, but them's the breaks.

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by AtlUmpSteve

Tom, the rule exists because several bats had colors so identical to the ball that players (and umpires!!) had difficulty seeing the ball off the bat; and the delay in recognizing the ball movement was considered a safety issue. .

Are these the same type of folks that argue a pitcher wearing mirrored sunglasses is a distraction to the batter?

[Rich Ives]

Originally Posted by IRISHMAFIA

Are these the same type of folks that argue a pitcher wearing mirrored sunglasses is a distraction to the batter?

I would object to the bat but not the sunglasses.

[IRISHMAFIA]

Originally Posted by Rich Ives

I would object to the bat but not the sunglasses.

I think it is a load of crap. The bat and ball are not together long enough to mae it difficult to pick up on the hit.

IMO, just another excuse for a failing moment.

Were bats with white barrels legal when using a white ball? Wouldn't safety also be a concern with a 60mph pitch coming from a optic yellow covered thigh at such a close range? And again, was that an issue when both were white?