Worst NFL Review Decision Ever?

[jTheUmp]

Absolutely the correct call.

Runner loses possession of the ball at approximately the 2 yard line, and doesn't survive the ground with control of the ball (as explained by APG).

The only thing he didn't do was maintain possession after contacting the ground.

And that's why it's a touchback rather than a touchdown.

Ball-buster of a play for the covering official, but that's why replay's there.

"most people" might not see it that way, but "most people" have no clue what the rules are.

[hbk314]

Originally Posted by jTheUmp

Absolutely the correct call.

Runner loses possession of the ball at approximately the 2 yard line, and doesn't survive the ground with control of the ball (as explained by APG).


And that's why it's a touchback rather than a touchdown.

Ball-buster of a play for the covering official, but that's why replay's there.

"most people" might not see it that way, but "most people" have no clue what the rules are.

I was responding to a post claiming he never made contact with the ground in bounds.

I basically said the same thing as far as "most people." As in this is a play that appears in every way to be a touchdown, but there's a part of the rule that makes it a touchback. It's one of the rules that doesn't necessarily align with "common sense."

[jTheUmp]

So you know the rule, understand the rule, and yet you still titled this thread "Worst NFL Review Decision Ever?"?