|
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 05:07pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thoughts on this
Last edited by JasonLJ; Tue Oct 14, 2014 at 08:22am. 
|
|
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 05:11pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Not sure if Texas follows different rules but seems to me that there were several people touching or behind the 35, can't tell about how many were on each side of the ball. But what stood out to me as well was I doesn't look like the ball hits the ground. Therefore k can't catch the ball. Also looks like he was advancing it which he also can't do. Now I watched this on my phone so I could be wrong about the ball hitting the ground on the kick.
|
|
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 05:18pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
All I see is a mobile site without a video or link.
The NCAA rule is different from the NFHS rule as far as free kick formations go. All kicking team players except the kicker must have at least one foot on the 35 (technically the 30 in pure NCAA but in Texas HS it is the 35) but the rest of them can be further than that. As I understand the NFHS rule, all of the kicking team players except the kicker must be entirely inside the 35 correct?
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
|
|
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 05:28pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Is this the same play?
https://vine.co/v/OAX1YFQVDzq If so, it seems legal as long as the wide out player was inside the numbers some point after the ready. In NCAA the ball does not have to touch the ground in order for the kicking team to legally recover, it only has to go 10 yards.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
|
|
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 05:31pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 05:33pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 05:35pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not sure if it is high school or not. This would have never happened in PA. Everyone needs to be inside the 35, not touching it. And if they were, the ball doesn't hit the ground, (if it does, I don't see it) so there would be an illegal touching penalty.
|
|
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 05:39pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
I just watched the video you posted and it looks like the wide player shifted to outside the numbers however the player at the back of the huddle looks to be standing at about the 39. I think that makes this play illegal but it's close.
__________________
Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there. - Will Rogers
|
|
Mon Oct 13, 2014, 08:38pm
|
|||
|
|||
|
The only remaining consideration is whether it's a simulated substitution. The player keeps facing in-field, so I don't think so. If it were, then you'd have to say teams don't get to use the whole width of the playing area to line up in.
|
|
Tue Oct 14, 2014, 03:19am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Personal pet peeve of mine because of the 2-3 dozen times I have had to wipe off flags and explain to coaches why they don't get a "re-kick" after a first touching violation. As for the video, looks completely legal to me for NCAA rules as I know them (Disclaimer, I don't work NCAA rules at any level but occasionally look up differences because of a request of a HS coach who had a rule wrong, or though a NCAA rule applied. It really makes a difference if a coach is a former college coach. Jasper
|
|
Tue Oct 14, 2014, 08:21am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
Tue Oct 14, 2014, 08:35am
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
Tue Oct 14, 2014, 08:46am
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Thoughts | Clark Kent | Basketball | 17 | Wed Nov 25, 2009 03:09pm |
| Thoughts? | newladyref | Volleyball | 10 | Sat Apr 08, 2006 08:31pm |
| Your thoughts please | eventnyc | Basketball | 2 | Sun Feb 20, 2005 01:08pm |
| Need your thoughts | cypercat | Basketball | 7 | Mon Feb 14, 2005 04:06pm |
| Getting It Right - Your Thoughts? | WindyCityBlue | Baseball | 61 | Mon Oct 25, 2004 09:13am |
Linear Mode
