PF Ejection

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Suudy

It was loud enough to hear in the stands. And I know the U. He isn't likely to go half-cocked. I can get clarification next time I see him. But it seemed to me more like taking-charge-of-the-situation type loud and forceful, not screaming loud. At least how it seemed to me. Shrug.

Likely doing it to let the now-injured player and his teammates know that the situation was being handled and they didn't need to step in.

[Robert Goodman]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

The NF is saying that we are not to require D'Qd players off the field like other levels require. If teams want to do so that is on them.

And this has nothing to do with the tobacco debate at all. You just want to muddy the waters unnecessarily.

Somebody upthread wrote that Fed had made a POE of players remaining supervised.

[Adam]

Originally Posted by Robert Goodman

Somebody upthread wrote that Fed had made a POE of players remaining supervised.

Likely because officials had been telling coaches that the ejected player had to leave the vicinity. Or because coaches had that impression regardless of referee instruction.

[Suudy]

Originally Posted by Robert Goodman

Somebody upthread wrote that Fed had made a POE of players remaining supervised.

I did. And I confused it with removing DQ'd coaches.

[JRutledge]

Originally Posted by Robert Goodman

Somebody upthread wrote that Fed had made a POE of players remaining supervised.

I am aware and I am not remembering such a POE. But I have read other statements that suggest just that, I am just not so sure it was a POE.

Originally Posted by Adam

Likely because officials had been telling coaches that the ejected player had to leave the vicinity. Or because coaches had that impression regardless of referee instruction.

Exactly.

Peace

[BktBallRef]

Originally Posted by Suudy

My question was as you pointed out above. Disqualified players are to remain supervised, either on the team sideline or leave with an adult. The point here was I guess R noticed that the player was no longer in the bench area. I think the coach sent the player to the locker room to change. We don't know if he was supervised.

There's no rule that says he must stay in the team area. What he does after he leaves the game, as long as he doesn't re-involve himself in the game, is no longer our responsibility

[Adam]

Originally Posted by JRutledge

I am aware and I am not remembering such a POE. But I have read other statements that suggest just that, I am just not so sure it was a POE.

I think I remember that POE in basketball, but I may be mistaken.