|
|||
Quote:
I sincerely hope it doesn't take NFHS longer than one season to figure out how bad deleting AFD is.
__________________
Never trust an atom: they make up everything. |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
But I might suggest it to my state interpreter anyway!
__________________
Never trust an atom: they make up everything. |
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
PENALTY: . If the pass interference by either player is intentional, his
team shall be penalized an additional 15 yards (S27). This should be a POE then!!!!
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz! Bobby Knight |
|
|||
Don't hold your breath.
|
|
|||
And it would not change the issues taking away the AFD provision of the rule. You still could have a situation where no first down is awarded.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
If you flagged intentional interference, it might be two half-yard penalties.
__________________
Never trust an atom: they make up everything. |
|
|||
Or even if it is 3rd and goal from the 10 and a DPI happens in the end zone, it will be 3rd and goal from the 5 no matter how the DPI took place.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
The rules committee considers it two separate penalties (I know that violates the fundamental) so it would be 3rd and goal from 2.5. Still not a huge difference and still 3rd down.
|
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Exactly...well worth the risk because the penalty is better the result (TD) without it. I am not a fan of this change.
|
|
|||
when can you invoke this rule?
ART. 2 . . . No team shall repeatedly commit fouls which halve the distance to the goal line PENALTY: Unfair act – the referee enforces any penalty he considers equitable, including the award of a score
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz! Bobby Knight |
|
|||
Quote:
I brought this point up earlier in the thread. Its probably extreme but I can see DPI being committed on every pass play in a goal to go situation. I would imagine the repeatedly scenario would be invoked after the ball could no longer be moved for penalty enforcement, which is strictly my own opinion. It would boil down a game of chicken between A and B's head coaches. At some point A is probably going to flinch and call a run play. I forsee the AFD coming back very, very soon. Last edited by HLin NC; Wed Feb 13, 2013 at 09:46am. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
additional ncaa rules changes | SamIAm | Basketball | 11 | Wed Jun 10, 2009 09:09am |
Quiz/Questions to teach NFHS rules to HS Players? | MECU | Football | 6 | Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:58am |
Additional warmup pitches during defensive coaches rules discussion | moorg | Baseball | 3 | Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:40pm |
And still yet more players who don't know the rules | Bluefoot | Softball | 11 | Mon Aug 18, 2003 05:33pm |
More players who don't know the rules | Bluefoot | Softball | 13 | Sat Aug 16, 2003 06:58pm |