![]() |
|
|
|||
Safety. 8-5-2c
If you look up the rule, you'll need to revise your use of the term 'offense'. In rule book terminology, the offense is the team in possession. 2-43-1 So it's better to state your case using A and B: B intercepts in the EZ and holds there, running it back for a TD. A will have the option to accept the penalty (safety, 2 points for A and B will free kick from their 20YL) or decline it (TD for B). |
|
|||
Quote:
Let's see if he clarifies. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|||
Because holding by A after an interception... especially behind the play, seems a near impossibility. I think it's a rather safe assumption that by "holding by the defense", he meant "holding by the intercepting team" or "holding by B"
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
I'm assuming the opposite because, as Mike notes, it's vastly more plausible, and a charitable interpretation demands that assumption. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Punt Near Endzone | MOofficial | Football | 110 | Sat Sep 18, 2010 11:29pm |
Cameras in the endzone | 9redskin4 | Football | 4 | Mon Sep 19, 2005 07:26pm |
Holding in the endzone | IAUMP | Football | 8 | Mon Jun 27, 2005 07:19am |
Punt into the Endzone.... | Smoke | Football | 12 | Fri Oct 25, 2002 12:52pm |
Endzone fumble | Tom Cook | Football | 3 | Wed Mar 01, 2000 05:07pm |