The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 07:31am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
Slapping the Snap

I still say it is illegal and here is my rule coverage.

The snapper is not a runner so he is not like anyone else with the ball to be swiped at. The scrimmage has to start with a legal snap. If B interferes with that it is a disconcerting act and should be penalized, if there is contact with that act it should be considered UNR.

B has to start this motion prior to the snap to have any chance of slapping the ball.

9-5-1d. Using disconcerting acts or words prior to the snap in an attempt to
interfere with A’s signals or movements

Read more: CoachHuey.com - Interfering with the Snap
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz!
Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 08:17am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 37
If B encroached, the ball is dead. Otherwise there is nothing illegal about a player slapping the snap.

Let me add that if this were made illegal by rule, I would support it.

Last edited by Ia-Ref; Fri Oct 14, 2011 at 08:22am.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 08:19am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ia-Ref View Post
If B encroached, the ball is dead. Otherwise there is nothing illegal about a player slapping the snap.
Agree. In theory: possible to slap the snap legally. In practice: always encroachment.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 08:21am
Chain of Fools
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,648
Oh lord, not this again.

Just because it popped back up on Refstripes doesn't mean we have to endure it again here.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 08:45am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
I say the scrimmage has to start with a legal snap and any act by B to delay or prevent the legal snap is a disconcerting act and should be penalized as USC not 5 yards for encroachment.
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz!
Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 09:01am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 8,033
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
I say the scrimmage has to start with a legal snap and any act by B to delay or prevent the legal snap is a disconcerting act and should be penalized as USC not 5 yards for encroachment.
Say what you want. Luckily the rest of us have a rulebook.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'”

West Houston Mike
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 09:16am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
BS, to slap the snap B has to act before the actual start of the snap. Slapping at the snap is just like doing handsprings! it is not real football and is a disconcerting act and should be penalized!

The scrimmage has to begin with a legal snap! Any act by B to prevent or delay that is illegal by rule and intent!

My Rules Book says this. You know it is not a Rulebook, right?
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz!
Bobby Knight

Last edited by bigjohn; Fri Oct 14, 2011 at 10:09am.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 11:39am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
Agree. In theory: possible to slap the snap legally. In practice: always encroachment.
I don't think so. In children's football there can be big differences in quickness of players, and you could easily have slow snapper and fast opponent; and at all levels there can be a tell that allows the defense to time a snap exactly.

I'd ask Big John what other live ball actions are forbidden to team B once the ball is moved. Are they forbidden to enter the neutral zone until the snap ends? If not, are they forbidden to start their run forward before the snap begins? On a play where the snap is slung out far to one side, are they forbidden to try to intercept the snap? If they're forbidden to try to go thru the snapper to get to the QB, can the QB hold the ball under the snapper's crotch for a period while his receivers go downfield, secure in the knowledge that the defense can't knock the ball away while it's under the snapper's body, and can't shove the snapper into the QB?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 11:52am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
If the snap doesn't happen immediately it is an illegal snap. Blow it dead and walk off 5 yards on the offense.

There are no restrictions once the ball moves. I just don't think anywhere, anytime, anyplace, can a B player hit the ball before it gets snapped unless it was an illegal snap or the B player encroached.

To me that is the only way this situation should play out.
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz!
Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 12:17pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
If the snap doesn't happen immediately it is an illegal snap. Blow it dead and walk off 5 yards on the offense.
So the word "quick" in describing the snap should be interpreted as "instantaneous"?

NCAA & Fed use the same words (unsurprising, considering they got them from the same rules committee before they existed as organiz'ns) to describe the requirements of the snap, including the word "quick". So if it were interpreted your way, how could NCAA have a provision penalizing B's interference with the snap at AR 7-1-5 II (or whatever it is now)? It would always have to be a foul by A, as the scenario described by this ruling would be impossible.

Also, do you think the Federation is unaware of this NCAA ruling (which apparently hinges on the meaning of "is snapped"), and have just decided it's unnecessary and is implicit in their own rules wording?

The one thing I'll agree is that the rules makers, when long ago they required the snap to be quick and to leave the snapper's hands, intended to minimize the possibility of situations like that described. However, I think all concerned realized that the snap could never be instantaneous and that although such occurrences could be minimized they could never be eliminated. To me it's clear that NCAA has now decided that if a snap is not completed due to the action of either team, they won't allow a scrimmage play and will penalize the team at fault, but that other governing bodies continue to put the entire onus on team A and are willing to let team B benefit by whatever they can do to disrupt the start of the play or by whatever mess team A makes of an attempted snap.

Last edited by Robert Goodman; Fri Oct 14, 2011 at 12:31pm.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 12:19pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
The scrimmage has to begin with a legal snap! Any act by B to prevent or delay that is illegal by rule and intent!
A legal forward pass must go forward - so if B does anything to prevent or delay that from happening would be pass interference.

Slapping the snap requires B to start moving before the ball is snapped. So does a blitz - so a blitz is illegal motion by the defense.

A touchdown requires the ball to break the plane of the goal line. Anything by B to prevent or delay this is an unfair act.

Boy - this game sure is a lot more complicated with this new rule book!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 12:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
ART. 1 . . . A snap is the legal act of passing or handing the ball backward from
its position on the ground.
ART. 2 . . . The snap begins when the snapper first moves the ball legally other
than in adjustment. In a snap, the movement must be a quick and continuous
backward motion of the ball during which the ball immediately leaves the hand(s)
of the snapper and touches a back or the ground before it touches an A lineman.
ART. 3 . . . The snap ends when the ball touches the ground or any player.
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz!
Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 12:39pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
ART. 1 . . . A snap is the legal act of passing or handing the ball backward from
its position on the ground.
ART. 2 . . . The snap begins when the snapper first moves the ball legally other
than in adjustment. In a snap, the movement must be a quick and continuous
backward motion of the ball during which the ball immediately leaves the hand(s)
of the snapper and touches a back or the ground before it touches an A lineman.
ART. 3 . . . The snap ends when the ball touches the ground or any player.
Exactly right, it does not say how long a snap is. It begins when the snapper first legally move the ball and ends when it hits the ground or another player. Does it say another A player? No it says any player.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 12:43pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
Here is a play from Redding's NFHS Football Rules. "

Example 3-19 After the ready, all Team A players are set. As A53 snaps the ball, B72 reaches in and knocks the ball away. RULING: The umpire must decide whether the snap was illegal or B72 encroached.

It is highly unlikely the preceding example could occur without a foul. In practicality, for a defensive player to knock the ball away, either the snapper would have to hesitate after lifting the ball making the snap illegal and thus allowing the opponent enough time to touch the ball, or the Team B player would have to put his hand into the neutral zone before the snap."
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz!
Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Oct 14, 2011, 12:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
We need an EDIT!

ART. 3 . . . The snap ends when the ball touches the ground or any player.


should read,

ART. 3 . . . The snap ends when the ball touches the ground or any A player.
__________________
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my azz!
Bobby Knight
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Slapping the Snap bigjohn Football 82 Sun Oct 26, 2008 02:44pm
Slapping The Backboard kerry7 Basketball 17 Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:25am
Judgment calls on pre-snap and at-the-snap fouls??? ChickenOfNC Football 18 Tue Jan 09, 2007 01:44pm
slapping of the backboard timharris Basketball 2 Tue Dec 07, 2004 11:09pm
Slapping the Backboard rpirtle Basketball 22 Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:16am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1