![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
What about this stipulation earlier in the manual, could it be applied? Field Areas ARTICLE 9. a. No material or device shall be used to improve or degrade the playing surface or other conditions and give one player or team an advantage (Exceptions: Rules 2-16-4-b and c). OR Illegal Equipment ARTICLE 7. Illegal equipment includes the following (See Appendix E for additional details): f. Any equipment that could provide an unfair advantage to any player. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
The equipment rule is not there either. He's not gaining any unfair advantage. That would be more like using a tub of lard on his jersey or putting stickem on his gloves. Nothing to do with a kicking tee. We have bigger fish to fry than worrying about the width of a tee. |
|
|||
|
I'm with you on that one. The last thing I wanted to be talking about in the 4th quarter of a tight game. I think if I had been the white hat I would have told him to buzz off. But - it did get me thinking. Appreciate all the replies here.
|
|
|||
|
This actually isn't an illegal kick, but illegally kicking the ball. In the NCAA code, there is a difference. And the ball isn't dead (11 man; under 6 man exceptions the ball is dead IMMEDIATELY since Team A can not score) until the end of the play, not necessarily Team B possession, because it isn't a "kick" but rather, a fumble and loose ball because the holder lost possession of it. Its a 10 yard basic spot foul, but you would enforce from the previous spot. In this case, it would be half the distance.
As Jason said, the dimensions of the tee is irrelevant. Unless the officials perceive the device as being dangerous, and it isn't over 2" (Texas UIL; NCAA by rule its prohibited except on kickoff), we're OK. I have actually seen this -- in an 11 man jr. high game about 4 years ago. Defensive lineman broke through and got to the held ball before the kicker did and kicked it. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
To invoke 7f, you have to define "unfair" ... and since the definition of tee tells you what is "fair" - and this concoction fits within that definition... there is no reason to rule the "device" as creating an unfair advantage. Tee is legal. The kick is not. Most likely we're having a rekick at half the distance.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
|
Wait a minute, you saying that if I really used a brick as a kicking tee there'd be nothing you could stop that with? Is Fed's the only code that specifies pliable material? Nothing in NCAA about having dangerous items on the field? What if I wanted to kick off a bear trap?
Last edited by Robert Goodman; Fri Sep 16, 2011 at 03:04pm. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
|
You don't think that the holder pegging the ball down on a 6"x3" surface is easier to do than if he were trying to peg it down on a 3"x3" surface? It seems inherent to me that it provides an advantage, otherwise why would the guy be doing it?
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| My first media mention! (yes, its a doozy!) | TussAgee11 | Baseball | 13 | Sun Jul 20, 2008 11:14am |
| A Doozy of a Rule Question | UMP25 | Baseball | 27 | Sun Sep 04, 2005 10:21am |
| Doozy tonight | oppool | Softball | 4 | Sat May 19, 2001 07:57am |