![]() |
|
|
|||
Canadian kicking
Same as by the original kicking team, except that the definition of "blocked kick" makes no reference to the line of scrimmage.
|
|
|||
I imagine a kick by R that is blocked must by simultaneously touched by R's foot and K's body part that does the blocking.
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
No, but after contact with the player who blocked it, the ball has to travel forward from that team's perspective. Just deflected doesn't count.
|
|
|||
?????????????????
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
To be considered a blocked kick. Or has the definition of "blocked kick" when it's an open field kick changed? AFAICT it made a difference only in that the touching didn't put players of the kicking team onside. (That's long been a difference between Canadian football & rugby. In rugby you can really be strigged if you just deflect an opponent's kick slightly -- puts them all onside!)
When Fed had return kicks (i.e. kicks following CoP during a down), the spot of the kick was used like the neutral zone in determining the rights of the teams to the ball and fair catch. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Punt behind NZ | BroKen62 | Football | 22 | Thu Sep 09, 2010 09:18am |
Grounded free kick | phansen | Football | 7 | Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:09am |
Punt | ML99 | Football | 13 | Tue Apr 22, 2008 01:35pm |
punt | yankeesfan | Football | 2 | Sun Oct 16, 2005 05:53pm |
FG used as punt | cougarcoach | Football | 18 | Fri Oct 07, 2005 12:59pm |