|
|||
There should be a difference between OPI that is merely blocking downfield, and OPI that potentially prevents an interception. Seems the former should be penalized much less severely (15 and replay or 5 and LOD both make sense to me), but the latter is penalized harshly and correctly.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Indecision may or may not be my problem |
|
|||
I agree with Rich that OPI's penalty in NFHS is quite harsh. I would rather see it lose the LOD aspect (akin to other rule sets).
Also harsh is the hold behind the LOS (or fouls by A). I would not be surprised if these rules are revised in the future. |
|
|||
Quote:
Currently it would be 1st and 25-26 with the hold, or 2nd and 19-20 without the hold. Your change would be 1st and 20 with the hold, 2nd and 19-20 without the hold. Basically the ball will be in the same spot. The offense is gaining an advantage by fouling. If a guy is going to get a sack it is better for the offense to just hold him so that the down will be repeated. |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
When the defensive team forces a passer into a position from which he cannot safely deliver the ball to an eligible teammate and he is unable to escape the defensive confinement, the defensive team has accomplished its objective. If the passer is permitted to intentionally incomplete a forward pass without penalty, except for the immediate “spiking,” and thus avoid loss of yardage, the official by his poor judgment or lack of it, has taken away an advantage which was fairly earned. |
|
||||
Quote:
I would also eliminate the dead ball enforcement on simple encroachment. No reason that the defense shouldn't have a chance to get back and no reason the offense shouldn't get a free play in that situation (assuming the encroachment is on the defense, which is the case a majority of the time). |
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
Quote:
Quote:
All repeat-the-down distance penalties involve some imagination about what would've happened absent the foul, and there is no justice. In the case mentioned above, eventually the rules makers decided that on an apparent pass play, if A1 hadn't held B1, A2 would've gotten off a not-quite-bad-enough-to-be-grounding incomplete pass, so that the previous spot would be the basis for enforcement. |
|
|||
Quote:
No such problem on a free kick, however. |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rule reference | sj | Football | 2 | Fri Sep 17, 2010 09:16am |
NFHS Exam Rule Reference (Question 62 & 66) | U-Cant-C-Me | Basketball | 12 | Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:17am |
Looking for a rule reference | stripes | Basketball | 4 | Tue Nov 10, 2009 05:14am |
Rule Reference Please | doghead | Basketball | 8 | Wed Feb 06, 2002 02:15pm |
Rule reference please! | Danvrapp | Basketball | 5 | Wed Jan 30, 2002 03:50pm |