|
|||
My first thought is the run ended in the end zone. The Penalty Enforcement Spot should be the end of the run. In this scenario the I am enforcing the penalty from the goal line with the ball ending up on A's 15 yardline
__________________
"Call what you see and see what you call!" |
|
|||
NF: 10-5-2, "The enforcement spot for any foul by the defense is the goal line when the run ends in the end zone and would result in a safety."
|
|
|||
This can't be a safety!
__________________
Every game is a big game |
|
|||
Of course not... another example of the classic FED and NCAA run-on sentence. Throw in a comma - they really mean that if the play WOULD HAVE resulted in a safety (sans the penalty), the enforcement spot is the goal line.
__________________
I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said, 'I drank what?'” West Houston Mike |
|
|||
Thank you...it is early but no that early.
__________________
Every game is a big game |
|
|||
The result of the play is a safety without a penalty. So you tell the team if they do not want a safety then accept the penalty. And based on the overall situation in the game that might not be something we should automatically assume.
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Canadian Ruling
Quote:
UR before YG is PLS or PBD. The bullets are A's choice first.
__________________
Pope Francis |
|
|||
exactly.
|
|
|||
Yeah, because a team would rather give the other guys 2 pts and the ball rather than replaying the down from the 15 (a 13yd gain with no down counted). Do you even think before you answer? Come up with some reasonable situation where any team would not take the penalty.
Last edited by Just Me; Fri Sep 24, 2010 at 10:46am. |
|
|||
Quote:
Yes, game situation they might want to take the field position with the two points instead of taking the ball at the 15. Not likely, but very possible which is why you give them the option. I do recall a pro coach took the wind in OT instead of getting the ball. And they lost but the coach wanted the wind so bad and ended up losing. Not our job to think for coaches. I think officials often assume teams want something only to find out the team wanted the not so obvious option. But hey, forgive me for having dealt with that personally as an official then talking about it only on a forum like some will do. Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
I've never had to deal with it personally, but I've seen many a college team take a safety with the lead so they could kick the ball to the other end of the field and play field position. I don't see the difference here. It seems reasonable to me that in some cases taking the safety may be the best alternative. But that's just me
|
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
Every game is a big game |
|
|||
Quote:
The enforcement spot is the goal line when (two conditions are both met, namely: ) (a) the run ends in the end zone, and (b) (the play) would result in a safety (if A declines the penalty). Yeah, that's better.
__________________
Cheers, mb Last edited by mbyron; Fri Sep 24, 2010 at 12:33pm. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
horse collar | yankeesfan | Football | 8 | Wed May 23, 2012 05:47am |
NFL Horse collar | gsf23 | Football | 16 | Wed Nov 18, 2009 12:44pm |
Horse Collar or Not? | babrown | Football | 15 | Thu Oct 29, 2009 01:20pm |
9-4-3k Horse collar | phansen | Football | 43 | Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:49am |
Horse collar | secondregionbug | Football | 19 | Wed Dec 26, 2007 12:00pm |