The Official Forum

The Official Forum (https://forum.officiating.com/)
-   Football (https://forum.officiating.com/football/)
-   -   horse collar in EZ (https://forum.officiating.com/football/59148-horse-collar-ez.html)

phansen Fri Sep 24, 2010 08:14am

horse collar in EZ
 
NFHS

Team A is on their own 2 yard line. QB A1 scrambles in the end zone and is tackled by horse collar in the end zone by B1. How is the penalty enforced?

BoBo Fri Sep 24, 2010 08:31am

My first thought is the run ended in the end zone. The Penalty Enforcement Spot should be the end of the run. In this scenario the I am enforcing the penalty from the goal line with the ball ending up on A's 15 yardline

ajmc Fri Sep 24, 2010 08:32am

Quote:

Originally Posted by phansen (Post 693635)
NFHS

Team A is on their own 2 yard line. QB A1 scrambles in the end zone and is tackled by horse collar in the end zone by B1. How is the penalty enforced?

NF: 10-5-2, "The enforcement spot for any foul by the defense is the goal line when the run ends in the end zone and would result in a safety."

GoodwillRef Fri Sep 24, 2010 08:45am

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajmc (Post 693638)
NF: 10-5-2, "The enforcement spot for any foul by the defense is the goal line when the run ends in the end zone and would result in a safety."

This can't be a safety!

BroKen62 Fri Sep 24, 2010 08:47am

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodwillRef (Post 693639)
This can't be a safety!

It would have been if B had not fouled. ;)

MD Longhorn Fri Sep 24, 2010 09:01am

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodwillRef (Post 693639)
This can't be a safety!

Of course not... another example of the classic FED and NCAA run-on sentence. Throw in a comma - they really mean that if the play WOULD HAVE resulted in a safety (sans the penalty), the enforcement spot is the goal line.

GoodwillRef Fri Sep 24, 2010 09:05am

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbcrowder (Post 693644)
Of course not... another example of the classic FED and NCAA run-on sentence. Throw in a comma - they really mean that if the play WOULD HAVE resulted in a safety (sans the penalty), the enforcement spot is the goal line.

Thank you...it is early but no that early.

JRutledge Fri Sep 24, 2010 09:35am

The result of the play is a safety without a penalty. So you tell the team if they do not want a safety then accept the penalty. And based on the overall situation in the game that might not be something we should automatically assume.

Peace

JugglingReferee Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:39am

Canadian Ruling
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by phansen (Post 693635)
Team A is on their own 2 yard line. QB A1 scrambles in the end zone and is tackled by horse collar in the end zone by B1. How is the penalty enforced?

CANADIAN RULING:

UR before YG is PLS or PBD. The bullets are A's choice first.
  • PLS: Team A 1D/10 @ A-17.
  • PBD: Score the Safety Touch, then Team B's option:
    1. Team B 1D/10 @ B-20.
    2. Team A KO @ A-50.
    3. Team B KO @ B-20.

BroKen62 Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:42am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 693653)
The result of the play is a safety without a penalty. So you tell the team if they do not want a safety then accept the penalty. And based on the overall situation in the game that might not be something we should automatically assume.

Peace

exactly.

Just Me Fri Sep 24, 2010 10:43am

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 693653)
The result of the play is a safety without a penalty. So you tell the team if they do not want a safety then accept the penalty. And based on the overall situation in the game that might not be something we should automatically assume.

Peace

Yeah, because a team would rather give the other guys 2 pts and the ball rather than replaying the down from the 15 (a 13yd gain with no down counted). Do you even think before you answer? Come up with some reasonable situation where any team would not take the penalty.

JRutledge Fri Sep 24, 2010 11:04am

Quote:

Originally Posted by Just Me (Post 693668)
Yeah, because a team would rather give the other guys 2 pts and the ball rather than replaying the down from the 15 (a 13yd gain with no down counted). Do you even think before you answer? Come up with some reasonable situation where any team would not take the penalty.

How many posts do you have?

Yes, game situation they might want to take the field position with the two points instead of taking the ball at the 15. Not likely, but very possible which is why you give them the option. I do recall a pro coach took the wind in OT instead of getting the ball. And they lost but the coach wanted the wind so bad and ended up losing. Not our job to think for coaches.

I think officials often assume teams want something only to find out the team wanted the not so obvious option. But hey, forgive me for having dealt with that personally as an official then talking about it only on a forum like some will do. ;)

Peace

BroKen62 Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:03pm

I've never had to deal with it personally, but I've seen many a college team take a safety with the lead so they could kick the ball to the other end of the field and play field position. I don't see the difference here. It seems reasonable to me that in some cases taking the safety may be the best alternative. But that's just me :)

GoodwillRef Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:11pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by JRutledge (Post 693676)
How many posts do you have?

Yes, game situation they might want to take the field position with the two points instead of taking the ball at the 15. Not likely, but very possible which is why you give them the option. I do recall a pro coach took the wind in OT instead of getting the ball. And they lost but the coach wanted the wind so bad and ended up losing. Not our job to think for coaches.

I think officials often assume teams want something only to find out the team wanted the not so obvious option. But hey, forgive me for having dealt with that personally as an official then talking about it only on a forum like some will do. ;)

Peace

Good point JRut...his number of posts stands at 5! :)

mbyron Fri Sep 24, 2010 12:28pm

Quote:

Originally Posted by mbcrowder (Post 693644)
Of course not... another example of the classic FED and NCAA run-on sentence. Throw in a comma - they really mean that if the play WOULD HAVE resulted in a safety (sans the penalty), the enforcement spot is the goal line.

Actually, the grammar is correct here, though elliptical. Let me fill it in:

The enforcement spot is the goal line when (two conditions are both met, namely: )
(a) the run ends in the end zone, and
(b) (the play) would result in a safety (if A declines the penalty).

Yeah, that's better. :rolleyes:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:50pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1