![]() |
|
|
|||
Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but I understand the statement "while still in the grasp of B1" to mean that B1 had at the very least a basic part in the tackle, since he did not let go. Would you say that if both B1 and B2 brought the runner down, you would call horse collar?
|
|
|||
Quote:
Peace
__________________
Let us get into "Good Trouble." ----------------------------------------------------------- Charles Michael “Mick” Chambers (1947-2010) |
|
|||
Quote:
![]()
__________________
I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell! |
|
|||
Quote:
Anyway, I have a tendency to be bull headed and stubborn on things I shouldn't be, so I humbly surrender. I can see where in the technical sense of the rule, you would be correct, but I still can't envision anything in real life that would make me call a HC if there is additional contact. Peace, Grits, and Gravy to you and yours. ![]() Last edited by BroKen62; Thu Sep 02, 2010 at 10:39am. |
|
||||
Quote:
I'm done with this, too. No reason to keep beating the same drum. However, I will say that there seems to be far less than a "consensus." Let me throw this hypothetical at you, though. This happened in Week 1 in my varsity game. A23 runs right. He's held up pretty quickly by multiple B players. Maybe a second before we would've ruled progress stopped, a B player on his knees reaches up from behind, reaches into the back of A23's collar, and pulls A23 straight back to the ground. Would you flag this? Last edited by Rich; Thu Sep 02, 2010 at 10:53am. |
|
|||
Quote:
![]() About the only way I'll call a horsecollar is one runner, one defensive guy, a hand inside the collar at the back or side, and a pull down backwards or to the side. Last edited by BroKen62; Thu Sep 02, 2010 at 11:10am. |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Horsecollar | jordan | Football | 7 | Mon Aug 30, 2010 08:24am |
Horsecollar Rule | Ref Ump Welsch | Football | 8 | Wed Sep 09, 2009 11:53am |