The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 01, 2009, 06:15pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 994
"Intentionally" go out of bounds

I am trying to confirm my understanding of NFHS rules 9.6.1 and 9.6.2. In summary, 9.6.1 states A or K cannot go out of bounds and return unless blocked out. Then 9.6.2 states no player shall intentionally go out of bounds and return.

Here are some scenarios. Please let me what you think.

1. A22 is running down field as a receiver, dodges a blocker, and in the process of dodging a blocker, does not touch the blocker but steps out of bounds. Ruling: He is guilty of violating 9.6.1. (Even if he returned immediately.)

2. B25 is covering a wide out and, getting "turned around" when the ball is snapped, accidentally goes out of bounds, and keeps running downfield just out of bounds, in the restricted area, stride for stride with the receiver. Ruling: Since he did not intentionally go out of bounds, he is not violating 9.6.2. He has not requirement to return at the first opportunity.

3. B25 is covering a wide out. On the snap, the wide out steps two steps back, as if to receive a "quick out pass". B25 follows. The QB instead hands off to a running that goes toward that same side of the field. B25 see this, turns to his out side, runs straddling the side line for 20 yards, and is involved in the tackle. Ruling: (???) I guess my main question is in this or a similar play, how do you judge "intentional"?
__________________
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 01, 2009, 06:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
1. He's not committed a foul until he returns.

2. Agreed.

3. I've got no call on that play. Legal.
__________________
"...as cool as the other side of the pillow." - Stuart Scott

"You should never be proud of doing the right thing." - Dean Smith
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 01, 2009, 08:35pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 923
Intentional is so obvious you won't miss it. I've never had it happen but a fellow official had a player on the kicking team intentionally run out of bounds and then down the sideline so nobody would notice him (and thus block him) so he could then come in and make the tackle. That's intentional.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Sun Nov 01, 2009, 10:07pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: West Bend, WI
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef View Post
1. He's not committed a foul until he returns.

2. Agreed.

3. I've got no call on that play. Legal.
Well put, and agreed in full.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Mon Nov 02, 2009, 07:21am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by BktBallRef View Post
1. He's not committed a foul until he returns.
It's worth adding that, since the foul occurred when he returned inbounds, the spot where he returned is the spot of the foul. It's not where he left the field nor where he later participated (if he did), even though it's an IP foul.
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ABC's "Nightline" examines "worst calls ever" tonight pizanno Basketball 27 Fri Jul 04, 2008 06:08am
Over and Back by stepping out of "bounds" Loudwhistle Basketball 49 Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:50am
Can "FOUL" be made "FAIR"? PAT THE REF Baseball 60 Sat Feb 24, 2007 09:01pm


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09pm.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1