![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
The original intent of the numbering exception for scrimmage kick formations was so that: 1) If the team's long snapper was numbered 1-49 or 80-99, he could legally snap the ball in a normal balanced formation, in which he is the center, without sacrificing an eligible receiver by having an end numbered 50-79. 2) If the team was punting, the team could use players numbered 1-49 or 80-99 for the coverage team, as they may be better for the job than normal linemen. After teams starting taking advantage of this rule on every snap, the numbering exception was re-written. Exception 1 allows the long snapper to have an eligible number in a balanced formation for field goals, without a fifth player numbered 50-79. Exception 2 allows for any player to have an eligible number on 4th down, for the punting situation. If the snapper is not between the ends, he is by definition not in the game under the numbering exception. He's eligible by number and position. There are five linemen numbered 50-79. The formation and numbering are legal. |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Illegal Formation | ChicagoLJ | Football | 21 | Wed Oct 07, 2009 09:51am |
| illegal formation? | yankeesfan | Football | 11 | Thu Nov 16, 2006 11:45pm |
| NFL Illegal Formation | Suudy | Football | 11 | Mon Oct 23, 2006 03:44pm |
| illegal formation? | yankeesfan | Football | 35 | Mon Oct 03, 2005 09:16pm |
| Illegal Formation or Illegal participation? | wgw | Football | 9 | Mon Aug 29, 2005 09:31am |