The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 12:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oak Park, IL
Posts: 50
Numbering Restrictions - Backfield

Can #52 line up in the back field and go out for a pass under Federation rules? I know there are numbering restrictions for linemen but the number guidelines in the rulebook are listed as recommendations. Any guidance would be helpful.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 12:21pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,153
he can line up in the backfield but he is not wearing an eligible number and can not catch a forward pass. He can carry the ball and catch a backwards pass.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 01:02pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 276
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjohn View Post
he can line up in the backfield but he is not wearing an eligible number and can not catch a forward pass. He can carry the ball and catch a backwards pass.
Would the penalty be illegal touching? 5 yards?
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 01:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by bbcof83 View Post
Would the penalty be illegal touching? 5 yards?
Yes, enforced under the ABO.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 01:12pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oak Park, IL
Posts: 50
I called illegal touching but I wasn't too sure I was right. The defense declined the penalty and we just moved on. I am glad I got it right in retrospect.

Could it also be ineligible downfield on a pass if he didn't touch the ball?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 01:27pm
KWH KWH is offline
Small Business Owner
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 520
Lightbulb For further information, please see:

Ineligible Downfield - See Rules Book 7-5-12 & CASEBOOK 7.5.12 SITUATION A

Illegal Touching - See Rules Book 7-5-13 & CASEBOOK 7.5.13 SITUATION A
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 01:29pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 46
Quote:
Originally Posted by john_faz View Post
I called illegal touching but I wasn't too sure I was right. The defense declined the penalty and we just moved on. I am glad I got it right in retrospect.

Could it also be ineligible downfield on a pass if he didn't touch the ball?
Why would the defense decline the penalty? It is also loss of down.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 02:02pm
KWH KWH is offline
Small Business Owner
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 520
Quote:
Originally Posted by john_faz View Post
I called illegal touching but I wasn't too sure I was right. The defense declined the penalty and we just moved on. I am glad I got it right in retrospect.

Could it also be ineligible downfield on a pass if he didn't touch the ball?

john_faz;

With all due respect...

In retrospect, if the ineligible did indeed "touch" the pass, and, you then allowed the defense to decline the penalty, (which it sounds like you may not of informed them it includes a loss of down), it is highly likely, you got it wrong!
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 02:16pm
M.A.S.H.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by Niner View Post
Why would the defense decline the penalty? It is also loss of down.
This is my question.

However, two weeks ago, I watched an offensive pass interference penalty declined. Before the R could even get out the options to the defense the coach was yelling for them to decline the penalty.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 02:32pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 248
Perhaps the illegal touching caused the ball to bounce into the air and B intercepted?

In that scenario, I could very easily see Ill. Touching declined.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 03:35pm
M.A.S.H.
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthGARef View Post
Perhaps the illegal touching caused the ball to bounce into the air and B intercepted?

In that scenario, I could very easily see Ill. Touching declined.
True, that could be the case.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 04:55pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oak Park, IL
Posts: 50
You are right. I did not inform them of the loss of down provision. My bad.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 07:05pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,643
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjones1 View Post
However, two weeks ago, I watched an offensive pass interference penalty declined. Before the R could even get out the options to the defense the coach was yelling for them to decline the penalty.
Unless B ended up with the ball or something else out of the ordinary why is the R even giving options to B? Reminds me of after a long touchdown run with holding by A and the R calls the B captain over to him and says "you can have the result of the play which is a touchdown or we can go back 10 yards from the spot of the foul and it will be third down." Everyone knows what B wants, stop wasting everyone's time.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 07:09pm
KWH KWH is offline
Small Business Owner
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland Oregon USA
Posts: 520
Thumbs down Well thank you Captain obvious!

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthGARef View Post
Perhaps the illegal touching caused the ball to bounce into the air and B intercepted?

In that scenario, I could very easily see Ill. Touching declined.

No kidding????
However, since the poster in the OP supplied the additional information that "the defense declined the penalty and we moved on" it is highly unlikely your scenario (a change of possession play) occured!!!
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber

Last edited by KWH; Wed Sep 16, 2009 at 12:58pm.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 15, 2009, 08:26pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by john_faz View Post
You are right. I did not inform them of the loss of down provision. My bad.
As you know, B can decline the yardage penalty. Can they decline the loss of down penalty?
__________________
Cheers,
mb
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No bat restrictions? WestMichiganBlue Softball 17 Wed Jul 08, 2009 08:39am
The U's are in the offensive backfield MJT Football 14 Tue Aug 28, 2007 05:08pm
Shift Restrictions Smiley Football 5 Thu Sep 21, 2006 09:42pm
Restrictions TRetzer Baseball 1 Tue May 11, 2004 07:31pm
Umpire in backfield Forksref Football 4 Fri Aug 29, 2003 07:46am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:13am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1