![]() |
Numbering Restrictions - Backfield
Can #52 line up in the back field and go out for a pass under Federation rules? I know there are numbering restrictions for linemen but the number guidelines in the rulebook are listed as recommendations. Any guidance would be helpful.
|
he can line up in the backfield but he is not wearing an eligible number and can not catch a forward pass. He can carry the ball and catch a backwards pass.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I called illegal touching but I wasn't too sure I was right. The defense declined the penalty and we just moved on. I am glad I got it right in retrospect.
Could it also be ineligible downfield on a pass if he didn't touch the ball? |
For further information, please see:
Ineligible Downfield - See Rules Book 7-5-12 & CASEBOOK 7.5.12 SITUATION A
Illegal Touching - See Rules Book 7-5-13 & CASEBOOK 7.5.13 SITUATION A |
Quote:
|
Quote:
john_faz; With all due respect... In retrospect, if the ineligible did indeed "touch" the pass, and, you then allowed the defense to decline the penalty, (which it sounds like you may not of informed them it includes a loss of down), it is highly likely, you got it wrong! :cool: |
Quote:
However, two weeks ago, I watched an offensive pass interference penalty declined. Before the R could even get out the options to the defense the coach was yelling for them to decline the penalty. |
Perhaps the illegal touching caused the ball to bounce into the air and B intercepted?
In that scenario, I could very easily see Ill. Touching declined. |
Quote:
|
You are right. I did not inform them of the loss of down provision. My bad.
|
Quote:
|
Well thank you Captain obvious!
Quote:
No kidding???? However, since the poster in the OP supplied the additional information that "the defense declined the penalty and we moved on" it is highly unlikely your scenario (a change of possession play) occured!!! :rolleyes: |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19am. |