The Official Forum  

Go Back   The Official Forum > Football
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 31, 2009, 09:18pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,193
Quote:
What's the prevailing idea on false start versus illegal motion on a back?
I don't know about prevailing, but we try and move everything we can into the false start category. Its much easier to kill a play than it is to bring back a touchdown. Plus, it takes less time and rarely, as long as something looks wrong with the movement, do we hear anything from the coaches. I'm not saying you base everything on that, but its a bonus.

To me, calling NCAA rules which are or may be a bit different than Fed in this area, I'm only going to call a live ball illegal shift if, say, 2 guys were shifting and one stops while the other stays in motion without stopping before and during the snap (may be other similar examples). However, if there is any movement toward the LOS by a player who wasn't already in motion (by himself) at the snap, we're shutting it down. We go over this in pregame as we believe it simulates the start of a play and fits under the false start category. In fact, I had this Saturday. One back starts to go in motion and the other one starts moving toward the line just before and during the snap. False start.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 31, 2009, 09:34pm
Fav theme: Roundball Rock
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Near Dog River (sorta)
Posts: 8,558
I would love to see a US guy ref a Canadian game.
__________________
Pope Francis
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 31, 2009, 10:45pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Aggie View Post
To me, calling NCAA rules which are or may be a bit different than Fed in this area, I'm only going to call a live ball illegal shift if, say, 2 guys were shifting and one stops while the other stays in motion without stopping before and during the snap (may be other similar examples). However, if there is any movement toward the LOS by a player who wasn't already in motion (by himself) at the snap, we're shutting it down. We go over this in pregame as we believe it simulates the start of a play and fits under the false start category. In fact, I had this Saturday. One back starts to go in motion and the other one starts moving toward the line just before and during the snap. False start.
What if it's just part of a shift? If the motion isn't quick, jerky, or some other way simulating action at the snap (such as pretending to play the ball), or seems to have no reason to exist other than to draw the defense, the backs have the right to participate in a shift, which may include movement in any direction. It's not uncommon for team A to confuse team B by starting someone in motion in a way that that player might on many plays be in motion at the snap, and then have other players move, and then have everybody reset, completing a shift. I've seen it countless times by double wingbone or flexbone teams, where they motion the wingbacks or shift them into deep halfback position. That sort of action also used to be seen by teams using what they called a Canadian style multiple offense, where they'd get as close as they could to Canadian motion under USAn rules.

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old Mon Aug 31, 2009, 10:53pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by JugglingReferee View Post
I would love to see a US guy ref a Canadian game.
Yeah, well, last I saw, not even Canadian teams were using Canadian style motion any more. Some time around 1980 they seem to have stopped the coordinated "flying" backfield and just started milling around to disguise the snap count. Now they look like nervous people waiting impatiently for the subway train to arrive and not knowing where the doors will open, or contestants on To Tell The Truth about to reveal who it was.

Robert
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Tue Sep 01, 2009, 10:33am
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 58
Quote:
Originally Posted by HLin NC View Post
I've had the same thing happen to me. That's why I decided long ago to leave a tailback and/or fullback to the WH as you get a different answer from different ones on FS/IM. I'll take the slot or wing back on my side but leave the ones closest for him and the he can do as he wishes.
On the wings, I definitely leave the backfield to the WH. But I'm going to be the WH three times this year, and I won't have anyone left to give it to!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old Wed Sep 02, 2009, 12:22pm
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by FBullock View Post
while the penalties are the same, this is illegial motion not illegial shift. Illegial shift is more than 1 player moving at the snap while illegial more is 1 person illegial moving at the snap. Again, penalty is the same.
Illegal shift is not more that one person moving at the snap. Illegal motion is more than one moving at the snap. An illegal shift happens when two players are in motion but one of them stops (shifts) while the other one continues his motion into the snap.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
shift, false start or nothing Bubba10Dara Football 15 Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:40pm
False Start or Illegal Motion Mountainman Football 14 Tue Nov 09, 2004 07:10pm
Tight End illegal shift/ False Start BigGref Football 11 Fri Oct 08, 2004 09:35pm
False Start or Illegal Motion??? The Ref of OZ!!! Football 12 Mon Oct 06, 2003 02:18pm
False start or illegal motion? dhoney Football 1 Tue Nov 20, 2001 11:03am


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31am.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0 RC1