![]() |
|
|||
|
Robert;
In response to your suggested wording of: [B]...of all players on A's line, only those on its ends and the snapper may wear a number other than 50-79 inclusive. [/B] I guess I remain confused. Why would you want to restrict say the "traditional left guard" from wearing #22 if his team was to meet all the other requirments of a scrimmage kick formation including: a holder, a kicker, a "covered up snapper" wearing #3, and four other lineman wearing 50-79 and these four lineman are located ANYWHERE on the LOS? Restated, I see no reason why, as long as you have four lineman wearing 50-79, the end can not be #79 and the left guard #22 and the covered up center #3. Obviusly #79, #3, & #22 would be ineligible, however since they are kicking a field goal it normally would not be an issue. Am I still missing something?:
__________________
"Knowledge is Good" - Emil Faber
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tackle Eligible | coachlaratta | Football | 20 | Mon Nov 13, 2006 02:26pm |
| eligible back | Forksref | Football | 10 | Sun Nov 06, 2005 02:36pm |
| Eligible/Ineligible? | WyMike | Football | 19 | Fri Oct 22, 2004 03:43pm |
| QB Eligible Receiver? | syavafootball | Football | 13 | Thu Oct 14, 2004 10:20am |
| Center eligible? | youmakethecall | Football | 10 | Sun Nov 30, 2003 03:56pm |